The Realme GT Neo and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage the potent Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset, aiming to deliver flagship-level performance without the flagship price tag. However, subtle yet significant differences in charging technology and overall feature sets create distinct user experiences, making a direct comparison crucial for informed buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, reaching 100% in 42 minutes compared to the GT Neo’s 50W. While both offer similar performance, the faster charging and potentially more aggressive thermal management give the F3 GT a slight edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 31 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 50% in 16 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | RMX3031 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Realme GT Neo
- Potentially more refined software experience (Realme UI)
- Balanced overall feature set
- Competitive price point
- Slower 50W charging
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Potentially better thermal management for gaming
- Aggressive pricing for the performance offered
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be polarizing
- Software bloatware may be present
Display Comparison
Both the Realme GT Neo and Poco F3 GT feature 6.43-inch AMOLED displays, but detailed specifications beyond size are missing. Given the market positioning, we can infer both likely target a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and gaming. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates to conserve battery. Color accuracy is likely similar, leaning towards vibrant, saturated colors typical of AMOLED panels. Bezels are expected to be relatively thin, but a direct comparison requires hands-on evaluation.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the sensor sizes and lens apertures are unknown. The Dimensity 1200’s ISP supports high-resolution image capture, but image quality will heavily depend on the quality of the sensors used. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess which phone has the superior camera system. We can assume both will offer standard modes like portrait, night mode, and video recording, but the quality of image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The CPU configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is identical, meaning raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable in most tasks. The GPU performance will also be very close. However, the Poco F3 GT’s cooling solution, potentially more robust due to its gaming focus, may allow it to sustain peak performance for longer periods, mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM configurations are likely similar, with LPDDR5 being standard, but the speed (e.g., LPDDR5 vs LPDDR5X) is unknown and could impact performance.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo features 50W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in 16 minutes. The Poco F3 GT significantly ups the ante with 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 42 minutes. While the GT Neo’s charging is respectable, the F3 GT’s faster charging is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the focus on performance, both likely prioritize a balance between capacity and charging speed over maximizing battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo if you prioritize a balanced experience and potentially a slightly more refined software experience, and aren't overly concerned with the fastest possible charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you are a gamer or power user who values minimizing downtime and maximizing uptime, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster charging speeds. Both phones deliver excellent performance for the price, but cater to slightly different priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco F3 GT's 67W charging generate excessive heat during charging?
While 67W charging is fast, the Poco F3 GT incorporates intelligent charging algorithms and thermal management systems to minimize heat generation. The phone dynamically adjusts the charging rate to prevent overheating and protect the battery's long-term health. However, some warmth during charging is normal.
❓ Will both phones run graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact at maximum settings?
Both the Realme GT Neo and Poco F3 GT, powered by the Dimensity 1200, are capable of running Genshin Impact. However, achieving consistently high frame rates at maximum settings will depend on the phone's thermal management. The Poco F3 GT, with its potentially more robust cooling, may sustain higher frame rates for longer periods.
❓ Is the software experience on the Poco F3 GT heavily customized with bloatware?
Xiaomi's MIUI is known for its extensive customization options, but it also comes with pre-installed apps (bloatware). While some of these apps can be uninstalled, others may remain. Realme UI on the GT Neo generally offers a cleaner, less intrusive software experience.
