The Realme GT Neo and Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro represent a fascinating crossroads in the smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver flagship-level performance at a more accessible price point, but they took different approaches. The Mi 11X Pro leveraged Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888, while the GT Neo opted for MediaTek’s Dimensity 1200. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro emerges as the stronger contender. While the Realme GT Neo offers competitive performance, the Snapdragon 888’s superior processing power and more refined thermal management translate to a smoother, more consistent experience, particularly during demanding tasks like gaming. However, the GT Neo’s faster charging is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 77, 78 Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 31 | 2021, April 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2021, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 50% in 16 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Celestial Silver, Lunar White, Cosmic Black |
| Models | RMX3031 | M2012K11I |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.60 W/kg (body) |
Realme GT Neo
- Significantly faster 50W charging
- Competitive performance for the price
- Potentially more affordable
- Dimensity 1200 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 888
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Superior image processing capabilities (likely)
- Slower 33W charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display, but both are perfectly adequate. Details on panel type (AMOLED vs IPS) and refresh rate are missing, but assuming both are AMOLED (typical for this segment), the key differentiator would be peak brightness. Without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to declare a winner. However, the Mi 11X Pro’s potential for a slightly more color-accurate panel, based on Xiaomi’s display calibration history, gives it a marginal advantage. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar overall design philosophies.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a definitive camera comparison is challenging. However, the Mi 11X Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s Spectra 580 ISP, known for its excellent image processing capabilities. Assuming both phones feature similar main sensors (likely 48MP or 64MP), the Mi 11X Pro’s image processing pipeline will likely deliver more dynamic range and better low-light performance. The absence of information on OIS is a drawback, but its presence on the Mi 11X Pro would further solidify its camera advantage. We can safely ignore any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Realme GT Neo’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, offers significantly higher single-core performance than the Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 (3.0 GHz). While the Dimensity 1200 has more Cortex-A78 cores (3 vs 3), the Snapdragon 888’s superior architecture and 5nm process lead to better overall performance and thermal efficiency. This translates to less throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The Mi 11X Pro’s use of LPDDR5 RAM (assuming standard for the segment) further enhances its performance capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo’s 50W wired charging is a standout feature, promising a 50% charge in just 16 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro’s 33W charging, which takes 52 minutes for a full charge. However, battery capacity is a crucial factor. Without knowing the exact mAh ratings, it’s difficult to assess real-world battery life. The faster charging of the GT Neo partially offsets a potentially smaller battery, but the Snapdragon 888’s better power efficiency in the Mi 11X Pro could result in comparable or even superior endurance despite the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo if you prioritize incredibly fast 50W charging and are a casual gamer who values a responsive experience for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro if you’re a power user, a mobile gamer demanding sustained performance, or someone who frequently engages in resource-intensive applications like video editing. The Mi 11X Pro’s Snapdragon 888 provides a noticeable edge in these scenarios.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 888 in the Mi 11X Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat, the Mi 11X Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate throttling. However, some performance degradation is still possible during prolonged, demanding gaming. It will still outperform the Dimensity 1200 in sustained performance.
❓ Is the 50W charging on the Realme GT Neo truly as fast as advertised?
Yes, Realme's 50W SuperDart Charge is remarkably fast. It can indeed deliver a 50% charge in around 16 minutes, providing a significant top-up in a short amount of time. This is a major advantage for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their phones.
❓ Does the Dimensity 1200 in the Realme GT Neo support high refresh rate gaming?
The Dimensity 1200 is capable of handling high refresh rate gaming, but the experience may not be as consistently smooth as on the Mi 11X Pro due to the chipset's lower overall processing power and potential for thermal throttling. Expect to potentially need to lower graphics settings in demanding titles.
