Realme GT Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A72: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Realme GT Neo is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers significantly faster performance. However, the Samsung Galaxy A72 remains a compelling option for those who value battery endurance and a consistently bright display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 31 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 50% in 16 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | RMX3031 | SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS, SM-A725M, SM-A725M/DS |
| Price | About 260 EUR | £ 174.89 / € 359.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279342 (v8) GeekBench: 6483 (v4.4), 1627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and demanding apps
- Much faster 50W charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 6nm process
- Display brightness and quality are unknown
- Camera details are limited, potentially less versatile
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Bright 825 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Solid battery life with 117-hour endurance rating
- Samsung’s reputation for balanced image processing
- Slower Snapdragon 720G processor
- Slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A72 boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 825 nits, making it ideal for outdoor visibility. While the Realme GT Neo’s display specs aren’t provided, Samsung’s panel offers a contrast ratio described as 'Infinite (nominal)', suggesting deep blacks. The A72’s brightness advantage is crucial for users frequently exposed to sunlight, whereas the GT Neo’s display quality remains unknown without further specifications. The A72’s larger screen size (typically 6.7 inches) also provides a more immersive viewing experience compared to the GT Neo’s likely smaller footprint.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without sensor size or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the A72’s brand reputation suggests a focus on color accuracy and balanced image processing. The GT Neo, being a gaming-focused device, might prioritize speed and dynamic range. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording, but this information is not provided. We can assume the A72 will have a more versatile camera system overall, given Samsung’s camera expertise.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) represents a significant leap in performance over the Samsung Galaxy A72’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The Dimensity 1200’s octa-core configuration, featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.0 GHz, translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The Snapdragon 720G, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both the Realme GT Neo and Samsung Galaxy A72 achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, their charging speeds differ dramatically. The GT Neo’s 50W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 16 minutes, offering a significant convenience advantage. The A72’s 25W charging is considerably slower, requiring more time to reach a full charge. This difference in charging speed is a key differentiator for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo if you need a phone for mobile gaming, demanding applications, or fast charging. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1200 provides a substantial performance uplift. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A72 if you prefer a phone with a consistently bright display for outdoor use, a more balanced feature set, and prioritize all-day battery life over raw processing power.