The Realme GT Neo Flash and Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range flagship space. While both aim to deliver premium experiences without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches. The GT Neo Flash prioritizes a balance of performance and rapid charging, while the K50 Pro leans heavily into raw processing power with the newer Dimensity 9000 chipset and even faster charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the GT Neo Flash’s Dimensity 1200. The significantly faster 120W charging further solidifies its advantage, reducing downtime considerably. While the GT Neo Flash remains a capable device, the K50 Pro offers a more future-proof and refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2022, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | RMX3350 | 22021211RC, 22011211C |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 410 EUR |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Potentially more affordable price
- Capable Dimensity 1200 performance
- Respectable 65W fast charging
- Older 6nm process node
- Less powerful CPU compared to K50 Pro
- Slower charging than K50 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro
- Superior Dimensity 9000 performance
- 4nm process for better efficiency
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Likely higher price point
- May run slightly warmer under extreme load (though 4nm helps)
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels with high refresh rates (120Hz is probable). However, the K50 Pro, being the higher-tier device, may benefit from a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially a more sophisticated color calibration. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the efficiency of that switching will depend on software implementation. Bezels are likely comparable, with both aiming for a modern, immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the K50 Pro, as the more premium offering, likely features a larger main sensor and potentially a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 9000. This would translate to better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it impossible to assess this crucial feature. We can assume both phones will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the quality of these secondary sensors will likely vary.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Realme GT Neo Flash’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The 9000 utilizes the Cortex-X2 prime core, offering superior single-core performance compared to the Cortex-A78 in the 1200. Furthermore, the 4nm process node translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the K50 Pro is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The CPU configuration – 1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 in the K50 Pro versus 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 in the GT Neo Flash – reinforces this advantage. While both support LPDDR5 RAM, the K50 Pro’s more advanced chipset will better utilize its bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo Flash offers 65W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in 35 minutes. The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro, however, boasts a significantly faster 120W charging solution, reaching 100% in just 19 minutes. This nearly halves the charging time, a substantial benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K50 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support in the K50 Pro also adds to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you prioritize a slightly more affordable price point and still require strong performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It’s a solid all-rounder. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro if you demand the best possible performance in this price bracket, value incredibly fast charging, and anticipate pushing your phone with demanding applications or games. It’s the clear choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9000 in the Redmi K50 Pro get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 1200 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9000 is more powerful, the 4nm manufacturing process is key. This process is significantly more efficient than the 6nm process used in the Dimensity 1200, meaning the K50 Pro should generate less heat under sustained load and experience less thermal throttling, even if it initially runs slightly warmer.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the 120W charging make compared to the 65W charging on the Realme GT Neo Flash?
The difference is substantial. 19 minutes to 100% on the K50 Pro versus 35 minutes on the GT Neo Flash saves you nearly 20 minutes per charge. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day, minimizing downtime.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Dimensity 9000 and 1200 significant enough to justify the potential price increase of the Redmi K50 Pro?
For demanding users – gamers, content creators, or those running resource-intensive applications – the performance difference is very noticeable. The Dimensity 9000’s Cortex-X2 core and improved GPU provide a significant uplift. However, for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming, the difference may be less apparent.
