The Realme GT Neo Flash and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-to-high range smartphone market. Both aggressively target gamers and performance enthusiasts, but they achieve this through different approaches – the Realme prioritizing a balanced experience with 65W charging, while the Poco goes all-in on raw power with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and blazing-fast 120W charging. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid refueling, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, despite potential thermal concerns, offers a significant performance uplift over the Dimensity 1200, and the 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the Realme GT Neo Flash remains a strong contender for those seeking a more efficient and potentially cooler experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | RMX3350 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 81h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 952124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Potentially better thermal management due to the 6nm Dimensity 1200.
- Balanced performance and efficiency.
- 65W fast charging is still very respectable.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.
- Slower charging speed than the Poco F4 GT.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset.
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 17 minutes).
- Support for PD3.0 and QC3 charging standards.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to run hot and potentially throttle under sustained load.
- May require more active thermal management.
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels typical of AMOLED panels. However, specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are missing. Given the Poco F4 GT’s positioning, it likely boasts a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The Realme GT Neo Flash, while likely excellent, may prioritize color accuracy for a more natural viewing experience. Without further data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Poco’s target audience suggests a focus on vibrant, high-impact visuals.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the Poco F4 GT likely features a more versatile camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially more advanced features. The Realme GT Neo Flash may focus on delivering consistent, reliable image quality, but likely lacks the flagship-level camera capabilities of the Poco. We can assume both will offer acceptable performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance is where the Poco is likely to excel.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) is built on a smaller node than the Realme GT Neo Flash’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm). This translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better thermal management for the Snapdragon, though the 8 Gen 1 is known to run hot under sustained load. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s CPU configuration – 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 – offers a performance advantage over the Dimensity 1200’s 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. While both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, the Snapdragon’s superior GPU will provide a more noticeable boost in graphically intensive games. The Poco F4 GT is the clear winner for raw performance, but the Realme may offer a more stable experience under prolonged stress.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones have an endurance rating of 81 hours, despite differing battery capacities (not specified). This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the Poco F4 GT’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 17 minutes compared to the Realme’s 35 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime, making the Poco ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While the Realme’s 65W charging is still fast, it can’t compete with the Poco’s speed. The Poco’s support for PD3.0 and QC3 further enhances its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you need a phone that balances performance with efficiency, and value a more consistent experience during extended gaming sessions. It's ideal for users who appreciate a slightly less aggressive approach to cooling and charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you prioritize absolute performance, demand the fastest possible charging speeds (hitting 100% in just 17 minutes), and are willing to potentially manage thermal throttling during demanding tasks. This is the phone for power users and competitive gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate significant heat under sustained load. The Poco F4 GT likely incorporates advanced cooling solutions to mitigate this, but some throttling is still possible during extended gaming. Users should monitor temperatures and consider using performance profiles to balance performance and thermal management.
❓ How does the 120W charging of the Poco F4 GT affect battery health over the long term?
While 120W charging is incredibly fast, concerns about long-term battery degradation are valid. Xiaomi likely employs intelligent charging algorithms to minimize heat and optimize charging cycles, but some degradation is inevitable over time. The convenience of rapid charging often outweighs these concerns for many users.
❓ Is the Dimensity 1200 in the Realme GT Neo Flash capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 1200 is a capable chipset and can run Genshin Impact at high settings, though you may need to adjust graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. It won't deliver the same peak frame rates as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, but it provides a solid gaming experience.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
Neither device's specifications mention microSD card support. Given their focus on performance and premium features, it's unlikely either phone offers expandable storage. Users should carefully consider their storage needs before purchasing.
