Realme GT Neo Flash vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 11T Pro emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Snapdragon 888, despite potential thermal concerns, delivers a performance edge, and its significantly faster 120W charging (100% in 17 minutes) is a game-changer. However, the Realme GT Neo Flash remains a compelling option for those prioritizing value and potentially better sustained performance due to the Dimensity 1200’s 6nm process.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo Flash | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | RMX3350 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 6nm process
- Excellent value for money
- Respectable battery life
- Slower charging speed compared to Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Less powerful chipset than Snapdragon 888
- Limited display information
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Snapdragon 888 can be prone to thermal throttling
- May be slightly more expensive
- Battery life is comparable, not superior, despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 837 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels (though not explicitly stated), the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the 11T Pro, typical of AMOLED technology. The Realme GT Neo Flash’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume it offers a comparable AMOLED experience, albeit potentially with lower peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning of both phones suggests a focus on versatile camera systems rather than outright photographic excellence. We can assume both will offer a multi-camera setup, but the Xiaomi 11T Pro, being slightly higher positioned, may benefit from a larger main sensor or more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of details necessitates caution; a deeper analysis would require sample photos and detailed sensor specifications.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, designed for peak performance. The Realme GT Neo Flash utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm), with a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.0 GHz. While the Dimensity 1200’s core clock is higher, the Snapdragon 888’s more advanced architecture and 5nm process generally translate to superior overall performance, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. However, the 6nm process of the Dimensity 1200 *could* lead to better thermal efficiency and less throttling under sustained load. Both phones feature octa-core CPUs with similar mid-tier and efficiency cores, but the Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU is a significant advantage for gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 92 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s 120W charging is the standout feature, achieving 72% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 17 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Realme GT Neo Flash’s 65W charging, which takes 35 minutes for a full charge. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Xiaomi’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The convenience of extremely fast charging is a major benefit for users who frequently need to top up their phones quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you prioritize sustained gaming performance and value for money, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who frequently engage in extended gaming sessions or multitasking. Buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro if you demand the absolute fastest charging available, and need the raw processing power of the Snapdragon 888 for demanding applications or consistently high frame rates in graphically intensive games.