Realme GT Neo Flash vs vivo iQOO 9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and future-proofing, the vivo iQOO 9 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset offers a performance edge, and the inclusion of 120W wired and 50W wireless charging provides unparalleled convenience. However, the Realme GT Neo Flash remains a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers seeking a solid all-around experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo Flash | vivo iQOO 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2022, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back or aramid fiber back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 164.8 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 204 g or 210 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 (V6) | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 20 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Legend (White w/ BMW M branding), Dark Cruise, Orange |
| Models | RMX3350 | V2172A, I2022 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 862324 (v8), 997948 (v9) GeekBench: 3708 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Faster charging than many competitors (65W)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Likely a less advanced camera system
- No wireless charging
vivo iQOO 9 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
- Industry-leading 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can run hotter under sustained load
- May require more frequent charging despite similar endurance rating
Display Comparison
The iQOO 9 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its measured peak brightness of 1000 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Realme GT Neo Flash’s display specifications aren’t provided, the iQOO 9 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The absence of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as on some competitors, but the iQOO 9 Pro’s brightness makes it the clear winner for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the iQOO 9 Pro, being a flagship-level device, likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of details on the Realme GT Neo Flash suggests a more basic camera setup focused on general-purpose photography. We can assume the iQOO 9 Pro will deliver superior low-light performance and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme GT Neo Flash utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm), while the iQOO 9 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s 4nm process offers improved thermal efficiency compared to the Dimensity 1200’s 6nm node, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 core at 3.00 GHz provides a performance boost over the Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.0 GHz. However, the Dimensity 1200’s triple Cortex-A78 cores could offer competitive multi-core performance. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the iQOO 9 Pro’s superior chipset will likely translate to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 97 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the iQOO 9 Pro’s charging capabilities are dramatically faster. Its 120W wired charging can reach 50% in just 8 minutes and 100% in 20 minutes, compared to the Realme GT Neo Flash’s 65W charging which takes 35 minutes for a full charge. The iQOO 9 Pro also adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering unparalleled convenience and versatility. The faster charging speeds of the iQOO 9 Pro effectively mitigate any potential battery life differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you need a fast-charging phone with reliable performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and value affordability. It’s ideal for users who don’t necessarily require the absolute latest chipset. Buy the vivo iQOO 9 Pro if you prefer a top-tier processor for demanding games and applications, and prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds – both wired and wireless – alongside a brighter display.