Realme GT Neo Flash vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Realme GT Neo Flash is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 778G in the A73 5G, and the 65W charging is dramatically faster. However, the A73 5G provides a more polished software experience and potentially longer software support.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo Flash | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | RMX3350 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Significantly faster charging (65W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 1200)
- Better gaming performance
- Potentially less refined software experience
- May receive fewer software updates
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Polished Samsung software experience
- Potentially longer software support
- Balanced feature set
- Slower charging (25W)
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Lower gaming performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a top-tier display, but differences exist. While specific display specs (resolution, peak brightness) aren't provided, the A73 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles. However, the GT Neo Flash’s display is likely tuned for a more vibrant, gaming-focused experience. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price segment. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate adjustments won't be as power-efficient as on flagship models.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the A73 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more consistent and pleasing results in various lighting conditions. The GT Neo Flash may prioritize a more vibrant, contrast-rich look. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor would be a significant differentiator, favoring the device that includes it. We can assume both phones will include a standard suite of camera modes, but the A73 5G’s software is likely to offer more advanced features and editing tools. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo Flash’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a significantly more powerful processor than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 1200’s CPU configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a substantial advantage in multi-core performance compared to the A73’s 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. While both use 6nm fabrication, the Dimensity 1200’s architecture delivers more raw processing power. The GT Neo Flash is likely to exhibit less throttling under sustained load due to its more robust cooling system (based on Realme’s gaming-focused branding).
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo Flash’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a 100% charge in just 35 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s 25W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to fully replenish the battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the GT Neo Flash mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the GT Neo Flash’s charging speed. The A73 5G will likely offer slightly better battery life in moderate usage scenarios due to the more efficient Snapdragon 778G, but the convenience of the GT Neo Flash’s rapid charging is a compelling advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or frequent multitasking, and if minimizing charging downtime is crucial. Its superior chipset and charging capabilities cater to power users. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a more refined software experience, value Samsung’s ecosystem integration, and prioritize a balanced feature set over outright performance. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday use.