Realme consistently delivers impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The GT Neo Flash and X7 Max 5G are both powered by the Dimensity 1200 chipset, but offer distinct features and experiences. This comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo Flash takes the lead with its significantly faster 65W charging and likely improved software experience. While the X7 Max 5G boasts excellent battery life and a bright display, the Neo Flash's charging speed and potentially newer features make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2021, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2021, June 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Dragontrail Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 50W wired, 50% in 16 min
2.5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Mercury Silver, Asteroid Black, Milky Way |
| Models | RMX3350 | - |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.1 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 605819 (v8), 680671 (v9)
GeekBench: 13105 (v4.4), 2614 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Faster 65W Charging
- Potentially Newer Software
- Likely Improved Design
- Modern Display Technology
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life than X7 Max 5G
- Camera details are limited
Realme X7 Max 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life (110h Endurance)
- Bright 640 nits Display
- 50W Wired Charging
- 2.5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging Speed
- Older Software
- Potentially Less Refined Design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch Super AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The X7 Max 5G is noted for its 640 nits max brightness, which is a slight advantage in outdoor visibility. The GT Neo Flash likely has a more modern display panel with potentially better color accuracy and HDR support, though specific details are limited. The X7 Max 5G's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim and doesn't necessarily translate to a significantly better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. Image quality will depend on sensor size, image processing algorithms, and software features. The GT Neo Flash may have newer camera technology and software enhancements for improved low-light performance and video recording.
Performance
Both devices share the same Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset and CPU configuration, ensuring comparable performance in everyday tasks and gaming. However, software optimization can play a crucial role. The GT Neo Flash, being a newer device, likely benefits from more refined software, potentially leading to smoother performance and better resource management. Thermal management could also differ, impacting sustained performance during demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The X7 Max 5G holds a clear advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 110 hours. The GT Neo Flash's battery capacity is likely smaller, but it compensates with significantly faster 65W charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 35 minutes. This means less time plugged in, despite potentially shorter overall battery life.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo Flash is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, a modern software experience, and potentially a slightly more refined design. The Realme X7 Max 5G is a great option for those who value exceptional battery life and a bright display, and are comfortable with a slightly older software version.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme GT Neo Flash worth upgrading from the X7 Max 5G?
If fast charging and a more modern software experience are priorities, then yes. However, if battery life is your absolute top concern, the X7 Max 5G remains a strong contender.
❓ How does the Dimensity 1200 perform in these phones?
The Dimensity 1200 is a capable chipset that handles everyday tasks and gaming well. Performance differences between the two phones will likely be more influenced by software optimization than the chipset itself.
