Realme GT Neo Flash vs OnePlus 9RT 5G: A Head-to-Head Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly faster charging experience, the OnePlus 9RT 5G emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 888’s 5nm process provides better thermal headroom, leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions, despite the Realme GT Neo Flash’s impressive peak CPU clock speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo Flash | OnePlus 9RT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2021, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2021, October 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 74.6 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56”, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 65W wired, 100% in 29 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue |
| Models | RMX3350 | MT2110, MT2111 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 590 EUR |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Potentially higher peak CPU clock speeds for quick tasks.
- Competitive 65W fast charging.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- 6nm process can lead to thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Dimensity 1200 GPU may struggle with demanding games.
- Potentially less refined image processing.
OnePlus 9RT 5G
- Snapdragon 888 offers superior sustained performance.
- 5nm process provides better thermal efficiency.
- Faster 65W charging (29 minutes vs 35 minutes).
- May be slightly more expensive than the Realme GT Neo Flash.
- Snapdragon 888 can still generate heat under extreme load.
- Software experience may vary based on OxygenOS updates.
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature similar 120Hz AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), the specifics aren't provided. However, the underlying chipset impacts display responsiveness. The Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU can drive higher refresh rates and more complex visuals with greater ease. The Realme GT Neo Flash’s Mali-G78 MP16 GPU is capable, but may exhibit slight frame drops in graphically intensive scenarios. Bezels and color accuracy are assumed to be comparable given the price bracket, but without specific data, a definitive statement is impossible.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a precise camera comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 888’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally regarded as more advanced, offering superior image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The OnePlus 9RT 5G likely benefits from better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Realme GT Neo Flash’s camera performance will be good, but may not match the OnePlus in challenging lighting scenarios. We can assume both phones will feature a standard multi-camera setup, but the quality of the main sensor and the effectiveness of image stabilization will be key differentiators.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 9RT 5G’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) boasts a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering superior single-core performance compared to the Realme GT Neo Flash’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm) and its Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.0 GHz. While the Dimensity 1200’s higher clock speed *appears* advantageous, the Snapdragon 888’s more efficient 5nm process and architectural improvements translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon 888 also benefits from Qualcomm’s advanced AI engine. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the Snapdragon’s optimized memory controller provides a slight edge in bandwidth.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 65W wired charging, but the OnePlus 9RT 5G claims a full charge in 29 minutes, while the Realme GT Neo Flash takes 35 minutes. This 6-minute difference, while seemingly small, represents a tangible advantage for the OnePlus. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 888’s 5nm efficiency contributes to better battery life under sustained load, offsetting any potential capacity differences. The Realme GT Neo Flash may offer slightly longer standby times, but the OnePlus will likely last longer during intensive use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you need a phone that excels in short bursts of peak performance and are comfortable with potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load. It’s ideal for users who prioritize quick app launches and responsiveness. Buy the OnePlus 9RT 5G if you prefer a more consistent, reliable performance profile, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and value a slightly faster charging cycle.