Realme GT Neo Flash vs Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the Realme GT Neo Flash is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 6a offers a more refined software experience, excellent camera processing, and comparable battery life, making it ideal for those valuing Google’s ecosystem and computational photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo Flash | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 25 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 06 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | RMX3350 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 290 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Realme GT Neo Flash
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Potentially stronger multi-core performance with Dimensity 1200
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Camera processing likely less advanced than Pixel 6a
Google Pixel 6a
- Superior camera image processing powered by Google Tensor
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Peak performance may be lower than GT Neo Flash in some scenarios
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the GT Neo Flash (brightness data unavailable). While the GT Neo Flash’s panel specifics are missing, the Pixel 6a’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior OLED experience. Both likely utilize similar OLED technology, but the Pixel 6a’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs are limited for the GT Neo Flash, the Pixel 6a’s strength lies in Google’s computational photography. The Tensor chip’s image signal processor (ISP) excels at noise reduction, dynamic range optimization, and portrait mode effects. The Pixel 6a’s image processing is a significant advantage, even if the sensor size isn’t dramatically larger than the GT Neo Flash’s. The absence of a dedicated telephoto lens on both phones means digital zoom will be the primary method for long-distance shots.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo Flash’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-A78 cores, prioritizing sustained performance. Conversely, the Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) utilizes a more heterogeneous setup with Cortex-X1 cores designed for peak performance and AI tasks. The 5nm process of the Tensor chip *should* offer better power efficiency, but the Dimensity 1200’s larger core count could excel in multi-threaded workloads. The Pixel 6a’s Tensor chip is also heavily optimized for Google’s AI and machine learning features, impacting camera processing and voice assistant responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (data unavailable for GT Neo Flash). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Realme GT Neo Flash’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 35 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging with PD3.0. This faster charging is crucial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo Flash if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or frequent multitasking, and value the ability to top up your battery in under 40 minutes. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prioritize a clean Android experience, exceptional camera image processing, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.