The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Realme GT Neo 5 and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer impressive specs at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 5 boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and blazing-fast 150W charging. However, the Poco F5 shines with its excellent battery life, vibrant display, and potentially better value proposition. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: raw power or extended endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 09 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, White | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | RMX3706 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Realme GT Neo 5
- Blazing-fast charging (150W)
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Good display
- Stylish design
- Battery life could be better
- Camera may not be as refined as some competitors
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Good value for money
- Solid camera performance
- Mid-range performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Slower charging (67W)
- Design may be less premium
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, promising a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. While the GT Neo 5 has a good display, it doesn't match the Poco F5's brightness and contrast. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is often subjective. While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Poco F5 likely has a slight edge in image processing and overall consistency, especially in well-lit conditions. The GT Neo 5's camera is still good, but may not be as refined. Detailed camera samples and comparisons are needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Here, the Realme GT Neo 5 dominates. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a flagship-level processor, significantly outperforming the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Expect smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better overall responsiveness on the GT Neo 5.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 excels in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours. The Realme GT Neo 5, while having a decent battery, doesn't match this longevity. However, the GT Neo 5's 150W charging more than compensates, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo 5 is ideal for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance and rapid charging. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is a great choice for those prioritizing battery life, a bright and vivid display, and a more budget-friendly price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme GT Neo 5 worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and fast charging above all else, then yes. However, if you're on a tighter budget and value battery life and a great display, the Poco F5 is a compelling alternative.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Realme GT Neo 5 is the clear winner for gaming due to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
