Realme GT Neo 5 vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast charging, the Realme GT Neo 5 is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi 13T offers superior battery endurance and a more refined overall experience, making it the better choice for everyday users who value longevity over peak power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 5 | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 09 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 09 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Illuminated RGB (on the back) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, White | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | RMX3706 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 340 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Realme GT Neo 5
- Blazing-fast 150W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Potentially higher gaming performance
- Battery life data unavailable, potentially shorter than the 13T
- Camera specifications unknown
Xiaomi 13T
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- Bright 1264 nit display
- Fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support
- Dimensity 8200 Ultra is less powerful than Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Charging speed is slower than the GT Neo 5
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Realme GT Neo 5 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts usability. The 13T’s panel likely benefits from more advanced power management, contributing to its longer battery life. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are missing for the GT Neo 5, but the 13T’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both phones are limited. The Xiaomi 13T is described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, suggesting a more versatile camera system. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Realme GT Neo 5’s camera specs are entirely absent, making a comparison impossible. We can assume, given the GT series’ history, a focus on image processing for vibrant, social-media-ready photos. The Xiaomi 13T likely offers a more balanced and potentially higher-quality camera experience due to its broader feature set.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is architecturally superior for sustained performance. Its Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.0 GHz, offers a higher peak frequency than the Xiaomi 13T’s Cortex-A78 (3.1 GHz), but the 13T’s three Cortex-A78 cores provide strong multi-core performance. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 730 GPU is also generally more powerful than the Mali-G610 MC4 in the Dimensity 8200 Ultra. However, the Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s efficiency could lead to less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The GT Neo 5’s performance advantage will be most noticeable in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T excels in battery life, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101 hours. This is a substantial advantage over the Realme GT Neo 5, which lacks published battery life data. The GT Neo 5 compensates with its incredibly fast 150W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in a significantly shorter time than the 13T’s 67W charging (42 minutes to 100%). The trade-off is clear: the 13T prioritizes longevity, while the GT Neo 5 prioritizes speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 if you are a mobile gamer, frequently transfer large files, or simply demand the fastest possible charging speeds. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize all-day battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more balanced feature set without compromising on performance for typical tasks.