Realme GT Neo 5 vs Realme GT2 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 5 takes the crown for raw performance and blazing-fast 150W charging. However, the GT2 Pro offers a more refined design, potentially better camera versatility, and exceptional battery life. It depends on your priorities: speed vs. overall refinement.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 5 | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 09 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| Illuminated RGB (on the back) | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, White | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | RMX3706 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 5
- Blazing-fast 150W charging
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Excellent value for money
- Good display
- Potentially less versatile camera
- Design might be less premium than GT2 Pro
- Battery life not as exceptional as GT2 Pro
Realme GT2 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Premium design and build quality
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Brighter display
- Slower charging (65W)
- Slightly older chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Can be more expensive
Display Comparison
The GT2 Pro boasts a slightly brighter display (778 nits vs Neo 5's likely around 600-700 nits, based on typical Neo series displays) and an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting superior image quality. While the Neo 5's display is still excellent, the GT2 Pro's panel offers a more immersive viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED technology with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the GT2 Pro likely has a more versatile setup. The GT Neo 5 typically focuses on a high-resolution main sensor, while the GT2 Pro often includes a wider range of lenses (ultrawide, telephoto). Image processing and low-light performance are areas where the GT2 Pro might edge out the Neo 5.
Performance
The GT Neo 5's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 holds a clear advantage over the GT2 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The 8+ Gen 1 is a slightly overclocked and more efficient version, resulting in better sustained performance and less throttling during demanding tasks. Expect smoother gaming and faster app loading on the Neo 5.
Battery Life
The GT2 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 117 hours. The Neo 5, while having a decent battery, doesn't match this longevity. However, the Neo 5's 150W charging obliterates the GT2 Pro's 65W, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo 5 is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize speed and charging. The Realme GT2 Pro is a better choice for those seeking a more premium design, excellent battery life, and a well-rounded camera experience.