Realme GT Neo 5 vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a seamless, intelligent experience and exceptional camera capabilities, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is the superior choice. However, gamers and power users who demand the fastest charging and raw performance will find the Realme GT Neo 5 a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 5 | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 09 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Illuminated RGB (on the back) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, White | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | RMX3706 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 5
- Blazing-fast 150W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Camera system likely less advanced than Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Smooth and intelligent software experience with Tensor G2
- Versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse wireless)
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Less raw processing power compared to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1090 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the GT Neo 5. While the Realme’s panel specs are missing, the Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) ensures deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate, potentially improving battery life, a feature not confirmed for the GT Neo 5. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is geared towards content consumption and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system is a cornerstone of its appeal, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for the GT Neo 5, the Pixel 7 Pro excels in both photo and video capture, benefiting from advanced algorithms for noise reduction, dynamic range, and color accuracy. The Tensor G2 chip plays a crucial role in processing these images, enabling features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Pixel 7 Pro’s OIS and lens apertures are optimized for low-light performance, a key differentiator. Ignoring the likely inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on the GT Neo 5, the Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system offers a more comprehensive and refined experience.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) and the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) represent different approaches to mobile processing. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, with its Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, is optimized for peak performance, particularly in gaming. The Tensor G2, while featuring a slightly lower peak clock speed (2.85 GHz Cortex-X1), focuses on AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally offers better thermal efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both devices utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences favor the Snapdragon for raw power and the Tensor for AI-driven tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, indicating comparable overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the GT Neo 5). However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Realme GT Neo 5’s 150W wired charging is a game-changer, promising incredibly fast top-ups. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0 and reaching 50% in 30 minutes, pales in comparison. The Pixel 7 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the GT Neo 5. The GT Neo 5 prioritizes speed, while the Pixel 7 Pro offers more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 if you need uncompromising charging speeds (150W) and prioritize raw gaming performance. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a significant edge in sustained workloads. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a polished software experience, industry-leading camera features powered by Google’s Tensor G2, and a more balanced overall package with excellent battery endurance.