Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders are battling for your attention: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. Both pack the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, but their strengths lie in different areas – speed versus endurance. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one reigns supreme.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the undisputed champion of charging speed, reaching 100% in just 10 minutes. However, the Poco F5 Pro offers superior battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display. If speed is your priority, Realme wins; if endurance and display quality matter more, the Poco F5 Pro is the better choice.

PHONES
Phone Names	Realme GT Neo 5 240W	Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1xEV-DO	-

Launch
Announced	2023, February 09	2023, May 09
Status	Available. Released 2023, February 09	Available. Released 2023, May

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions	163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)	162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	199 g (7.02 oz)	204 g (7.20 oz)
	Illuminated RGB (on the back)	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density)	1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density)
Size	6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)	Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 730
OS	Android 13, Realme UI 4.0	Android 13, upgradable to Android 15

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM	256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm	-
Triple	50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope)	64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS	8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR, panorama	HDR
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video	1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS	1080p@30/60fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	24-bit/192kHz audio	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes (dual side)	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS	GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min	67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min
Type	4600 mAh	Li-Po 5160 mAh

Misc
Colors	Purple, Black, White	Black, White
Models	RMX3708	23013PC75G
Price	About 440 EUR	$ 449.99 / € 241.85
SAR	-	1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 99h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.2 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

Unrivaled 240W charging speed
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
Good AMOLED display
Stylish design

Lower battery capacity
Camera details are limited
Potentially higher price

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

Excellent battery life (99h endurance)
Bright and vibrant display (1059 nits)
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
Wireless charging support

Slower charging speed (67W wired)
Camera details are limited
Design may be less striking

Display Comparison

The Poco F5 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, offering a significantly brighter and more vibrant viewing experience compared to the GT Neo 5. While the GT Neo 5 has a good AMOLED display, the Poco's contrast ratio (infinite nominal) further enhances its visual appeal. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is a complex area. While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the Poco F5 Pro is expected to have a slightly more refined camera system due to Xiaomi's experience in camera tuning. However, the GT Neo 5's camera shouldn't be a slouch either. Further testing would be needed for a definitive verdict.

Performance

Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. While the CPU clock speeds differ slightly (Realme has a marginally higher X2 core), real-world performance will be very similar for most tasks. Expect smooth gaming, fast app loading, and effortless multitasking on both devices.

Battery Life

This is where the Poco F5 Pro truly shines. Its endurance rating of 99 hours significantly surpasses the GT Neo 5. While the GT Neo 5's 240W charging is revolutionary, it's ultimately compensating for a smaller battery capacity. The Poco F5 Pro offers a more sustainable battery experience.

Buying Guide

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is ideal for power users who frequently run demanding apps and games and value incredibly fast charging. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is perfect for those who prioritize all-day battery life, a stunning display for media consumption, and a more balanced overall experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Realme GT Neo 5 240W worth it just for the charging speed?

If charging speed is your absolute top priority, then yes. However, consider the trade-off in battery capacity. If you're frequently near a power outlet, it might be a worthwhile investment.

❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?

Both phones offer excellent gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Poco F5 Pro's slightly better cooling system might give it a marginal edge in sustained performance during extended gaming sessions.