The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders are battling for your attention: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W with its blazing-fast charging and the Xiaomi Poco F5, known for its impressive battery life and smooth performance. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner for those prioritizing charging speed and raw power thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, the Poco F5 offers exceptional battery life and a vibrant display, making it a compelling choice for users who value endurance and a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 09 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, White | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | RMX3708 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Likely a high-quality AMOLED display
- Premium build quality (assumed)
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Higher price point
- Camera performance details are limited
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Exceptional battery life (118h endurance rating)
- Bright and vibrant display (963 nits)
- Smooth performance with Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- More affordable price
- Less powerful chipset compared to GT Neo 5
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Build quality may be less premium
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the GT Neo 5's display details are less readily available, it's expected to be a quality AMOLED panel. The Poco F5's infinite contrast ratio suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. Overall, the Poco F5 has a slight edge in display quality and brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons are difficult without extensive testing. The Poco F5 is generally known for producing reliable and pleasing photos and videos. The GT Neo 5's camera is expected to be competitive, leveraging the power of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 for image processing. A deeper dive would require a side-by-side camera test.
Performance
Here's where the GT Neo 5 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Expect smoother multitasking, faster gaming, and quicker app loading times on the GT Neo 5. The Poco F5 is still capable, but the GT Neo 5 offers a noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 takes a commanding lead in battery life. Its endurance rating of 118 hours is exceptional, and active use lasting over 11 hours demonstrates its efficiency. The GT Neo 5, while offering incredibly fast charging (240W), likely has a smaller battery capacity to accommodate the charging technology, resulting in shorter overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you're a power user who needs quick top-ups and appreciates flagship-level performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 if you prioritize long battery life, a bright display, and a more budget-friendly price point without sacrificing too much performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the 240W charging on the Realme GT Neo 5 worth it?
Absolutely, if you frequently forget to charge your phone and need a quick top-up. It can charge from 0 to 100% in just 10 minutes.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
