Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Realme GT2 Pro: A Head-to-Head Showdown

Realme continues to push boundaries with its GT series, offering impressive specs at competitive prices. The GT Neo 5 240W boasts revolutionary charging speeds, while the GT2 Pro prioritizes battery life and a refined design. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the champion.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner for those prioritizing charging speed and raw performance. However, the GT2 Pro offers superior battery endurance, a potentially better camera system, and a more premium design. It depends on your priorities!

PHONES
Phone Names	Realme GT Neo 5 240W	Realme GT2 Pro

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1xEV-DO	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India

Launch
Announced	2023, February 09	2022, January 04
Status	Available. Released 2023, February 09	Available. Released 2022, January 08

Body
Dimensions	163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)	163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	199 g (7.02 oz)	189 / 199 g (6.67 oz)
	Illuminated RGB (on the back)	Splash resistant

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution	1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density)	1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density)
Size	6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio)	6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak)	LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)	Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)	Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 730
OS	Android 13, Realme UI 4.0	Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama	Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Triple	50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope)	50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification
Video	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS	8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR, panorama	HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	24-bit/192kHz audio	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared port	Yes	-
NFC	Yes (dual side)	Yes (dual side)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min	65W wired, 100% in 33 min
Type	4600 mAh	5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Purple, Black, White	Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue
Models	RMX3708	RMX3301, RMX3300
Price	About 440 EUR	€ 221.41
SAR	-	1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 117h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.3 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

Blazing-fast 240W charging
Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
Excellent performance for gaming
Likely good display quality

Potentially shorter battery life
Camera may not be as refined as GT2 Pro
Design may be less premium

Realme GT2 Pro

Exceptional battery life (117h endurance)
Potentially better camera system
Premium design and build quality
Bright display

Slower 65W charging
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 slightly less efficient
Performance slightly behind Neo 5

Display Comparison

The GT2 Pro features a slightly brighter display at 778 nits (measured) compared to the Neo 5's reported brightness, though the Neo 5's display is likely excellent. The GT2 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests strong blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a nominal value. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, offering smooth visuals. The GT2 Pro's design may also contribute to a more premium feel.

Camera Comparison

While both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities listed, the GT2 Pro is generally considered to have a more robust and versatile camera system. It likely features a larger sensor and potentially better image processing. The Neo 5's camera is likely competent, but not as refined as the GT2 Pro's. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensor size, aperture) are missing for both, making a definitive comparison difficult.

Performance

The GT Neo 5 240W holds a slight edge in performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is generally considered more efficient and powerful than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the GT2 Pro. Both chips are flagship-level and will handle demanding tasks with ease, but the Neo 5 might offer slightly better sustained performance and gaming capabilities.

Battery Life

This is where the GT2 Pro shines. Its endurance rating of 117h is significantly higher than what we'd expect from the Neo 5, despite the Neo 5's incredibly fast 240W charging. While the Neo 5 can charge from 0-100% in just 10 minutes, the GT2 Pro offers significantly longer usage time between charges.

Buying Guide

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who hates waiting for their phone to charge. The Realme GT2 Pro is a better choice for users who value long battery life, a more refined design, and a potentially more versatile camera experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the 240W charging on the GT Neo 5 240W safe?

Realme has implemented safety measures to ensure the 240W charging is safe. However, it's always recommended to use the provided charger and follow manufacturer guidelines.

❓ Which phone is better for photography?

The Realme GT2 Pro is generally considered to have a better camera system, offering more versatility and potentially higher image quality. However, both phones are capable of taking good photos.