Realme GT Neo 3T vs Realme GT2 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT2 Pro boasts a more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and a slightly more refined design, but the GT Neo 3T offers faster 80W charging and a brighter display. Ultimately, the GT2 Pro is the better performer, while the Neo 3T provides excellent value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3T | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 07 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 25 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | RMX3372, RMX3371 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 780 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Faster 80W Charging
- Brighter Display
- Excellent Value
- Capable Performance
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
- Camera Not as Refined as GT2 Pro
Realme GT2 Pro
- More Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Premium Design (likely ceramic)
- Better Camera System
- Potentially Better Color Accuracy
- Slower Charging (65W)
- Can Run Hot Under Load
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, surpassing the GT2 Pro's 778 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), resulting in vibrant and immersive viewing experiences. However, the GT2 Pro's color accuracy might be slightly better due to its AMOLED panel (assumed, not explicitly stated), while the Neo 3T uses an AMOLED display as well.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the GT2 Pro generally produces better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The GT2 Pro's main sensor is likely larger (assumed based on typical flagship specs), allowing for more light capture. The GT Neo 3T's camera is still very good for the price, offering vibrant colors and decent detail.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the GT2 Pro is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 870 in the GT Neo 3T. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games. While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 8 Gen 1 offers a noticeable performance boost. Thermal management is a known issue with the 8 Gen 1, so sustained performance might be slightly impacted.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar, with both phones achieving an endurance rating of around 118 hours. The GT Neo 3T, however, has a clear advantage in charging speed, boasting 80W wired charging compared to the GT2 Pro's 65W. This means the Neo 3T can charge much faster.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo 3T is ideal for gamers and users prioritizing fast charging and a vibrant display on a budget. The Realme GT2 Pro is a better choice for those seeking top-tier performance, a more premium design, and a slightly better camera system, willing to spend a bit more.