Realme GT Neo 3T vs Realme GT2: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT2 edges out the GT Neo 3T thanks to its brighter display and more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset. While the Neo 3T boasts faster charging, the GT2's overall package, including its design and slightly better performance, makes it the winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3T | Realme GT2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 07 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 25 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) | 194.5 / 199.8 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | RMX3372, RMX3371 | RMX3310, RMX3312, RMX3311 |
| Price | About 780 EUR | About 790 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 810512 (v9) GeekBench: 3487 (v5.1) GFXBench: 56fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Faster 80W Charging
- Excellent Value
- Smooth Performance
- Good Display
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
- Design Less Premium
Realme GT2
- Brighter Display
- More Powerful Chipset
- Premium Design
- Good Camera
- Slower Charging (65W)
- Slightly Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Realme GT2 takes the lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits compared to the GT Neo 3T's 803 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite, nominally), the GT2's higher brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Both utilize AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, providing a vibrant and responsive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two devices. Both offer versatile camera systems capable of capturing decent photos and videos in various conditions. However, the GT2's image processing might be slightly more refined, resulting in marginally better image quality in certain scenarios. Low-light performance is adequate on both.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 in the Realme GT2 holds a slight advantage over the Snapdragon 870 in the GT Neo 3T. While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 888 offers a noticeable boost in processing power, particularly in demanding tasks and games. Both phones handle everyday usage with ease, but the GT2 provides a smoother experience overall.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar, with both phones achieving an endurance rating of around 115-118 hours. The GT Neo 3T does have a significant advantage in charging speed, offering 80W wired charging compared to the GT2's 65W. This means the Neo 3T can charge much faster, though the GT2 still manages a full charge in just 33 minutes.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Realme GT Neo 3T? Gamers and those prioritizing fast charging will appreciate the Neo 3T's performance and 80W charging. Who should buy the Realme GT2? Users seeking a brighter display, a more premium design, and slightly better overall performance will find the GT2 a better fit.