Realme GT Neo 3 vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: Which Gaming Phone Reigns Supreme?

The Realme GT Neo 3 and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT represent a fascinating clash in the mid-to-high range smartphone market. Both aggressively target gamers and performance enthusiasts, but they achieve this through different approaches – Realme prioritizing a balanced experience with the Dimensity 8100, while Xiaomi opts for raw power with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best overall package.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging, achieving a full charge in just 17 minutes, is a significant advantage, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 delivers peak performance. However, the Realme GT Neo 3 offers a more efficient chipset and a potentially more stable long-term experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Realme GT Neo 3 Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2022, March 222022, April 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, March 30Available. Released 2022, April 28
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame
Dimensions163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in)162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)210 g (7.41 oz)
 -Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 730
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYes (dual side)Yes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging80W wired, 100% in 32 min120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 4700 mAh
Misc
ColorsPlain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue)Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow
ModelsRMX3561, RMX356021121210G
PriceAbout 430 EUR€ 227.11 / £ 339.99
SAR-1.09 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.59 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 81h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker -27.1 LUFS (Good) -27.4 LUFS (Good)
Performance AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1)

Realme GT Neo 3

  • More efficient Dimensity 8100 chipset
  • Brighter display (796 nits)
  • Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency

  • Slower charging (32 minutes)
  • Less powerful CPU compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

  • Ultra-fast 120W charging (17 minutes)
  • More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
  • Stronger peak performance for demanding tasks

  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
  • Potentially lower battery efficiency

Display Comparison

Both the Realme GT Neo 3 and Poco F4 GT feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term. However, the Realme GT Neo 3 boasts a measured peak brightness of 796 nits, a crucial metric for outdoor visibility. While the Poco F4 GT’s brightness isn’t specified, the GT Neo 3’s figure suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, but without refresh rate or resolution details, a direct comparison is limited. The lack of LTPO technology in either device suggests they won't dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power saving.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or specific feature details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both will offer competent camera systems for social media and casual photography, but neither is likely to challenge flagship camera performance. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera capabilities as a key selling point.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, promising top-tier CPU performance. However, this comes at the cost of thermal efficiency. The Realme GT Neo 3’s Dimensity 8100 (5nm) utilizes four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8100 generally translates to better power efficiency and less thermal throttling under sustained load, potentially offering more consistent performance during long gaming sessions. The Poco F4 GT’s CPU architecture, with its A710 and A510 cores, is a generation newer, but the efficiency gains of the 5nm node may close the gap.

Battery Life

The Poco F4 GT’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a 100% charge in just 17 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Realme GT Neo 3’s 80W charging, which takes 32 minutes. Both phones share an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). The Poco F4 GT’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.

Buying Guide

Buy the Realme GT Neo 3 if you prioritize sustained performance and efficient power management for extended gaming sessions, and value a slightly more balanced thermal profile. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to trade some efficiency for peak performance, especially if you frequently top up your battery throughout the day.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate significant heat under sustained load. While the Poco F4 GT likely incorporates cooling solutions, some thermal throttling is expected during extended gaming. The Realme GT Neo 3’s Dimensity 8100, with its more efficient 5nm process, is less prone to overheating and may offer more consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Poco F4 GT compared to the 80W charging on the Realme GT Neo 3 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco F4 GT can charge from 0-100% in 17 minutes, while the Realme GT Neo 3 takes 32 minutes. This means you can add a significant amount of charge – enough for several hours of use – in just a short amount of time with the Poco F4 GT, making it ideal for users who need quick top-ups.
❓ Does the Poco F4 GT support external displays or accessories via its USB-C port?
While not explicitly stated, the Poco F4 GT’s USB-C port likely supports DisplayPort Alt Mode for video output to external displays. It also supports PD3.0 charging, indicating broader compatibility with various USB-C accessories. However, specific accessory support should be verified with Xiaomi’s documentation.