Realme GT Neo 3 vs Realme GT2 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT2 Pro offers a more premium experience with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and potentially better camera capabilities. However, the GT Neo 3 shines with its faster 80W charging and a slightly brighter display, making it a compelling choice for those prioritizing speed and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3 | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 22 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 30 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue) | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | RMX3561, RMX3560 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 3
- Faster 80W Charging
- Slightly Brighter Display
- Competitive Price
- Excellent Performance for Gaming
- Potentially Inferior Camera
- Less Premium Build Quality
- Dimensity 8100 Chipset (less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
Realme GT2 Pro
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Potentially Better Camera Quality
- Excellent Battery Life (117h Endurance)
- More Premium Design
- Slower 65W Charging
- Slightly Lower Peak Brightness
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays with infinite contrast ratios. The GT Neo 3 edges out the GT2 Pro with a slightly higher peak brightness of 796 nits versus 778 nits, offering a marginally more vibrant viewing experience, especially outdoors. Both utilize AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates (likely 120Hz, though not explicitly stated).
Camera Comparison
While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the GT2 Pro is generally considered to have a more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 often pairs with better image processing capabilities. Specific sensor details are missing, but reviews generally favor the GT2 Pro's image quality, especially in low light. The GT Neo 3's camera is still capable, but not as refined.
Performance
The GT2 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides a significant performance advantage over the GT Neo 3’s Dimensity 8100. While the Dimensity 8100 is no slouch, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games. The GT2 Pro's CPU architecture (Cortex-X2 prime core) also contributes to its edge.
Battery Life
The GT Neo 3 boasts 80W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 32 minutes, a significant advantage. The GT2 Pro's 65W charging takes slightly longer (33 minutes). However, the GT2 Pro has an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting superior battery optimization and potentially a larger battery capacity, despite charging speed being slower.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo 3 is ideal for gamers and users who prioritize fast charging and a vibrant display. The Realme GT2 Pro is better suited for those seeking top-tier performance, a more refined design, and potentially superior camera quality, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.