Realme GT Neo 3 vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, intelligent experience and exceptional camera capabilities, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the better choice. However, gamers and power users who demand the fastest charging and peak performance for the price will find the Realme GT Neo 3 more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 22 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 30 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue) | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | RMX3561, RMX3560 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 3
- Blazing-fast 80W charging (0-100% in 32 minutes)
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset for gaming
- Competitive price point
- Camera system lacks detailed specifications
- Slower charging compared to some competitors (wireless)
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s AI enhancements
- Long-term software support and updates
- Strong battery life (84-hour endurance rating)
- Significantly slower 23W wired charging
- Higher price compared to the Realme GT Neo 3
Display Comparison
Both the Realme GT Neo 3 and Pixel 6 Pro feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Pixel 6 Pro edges out the GT Neo 3 with a measured peak brightness of 846 nits compared to the GT Neo 3’s 796 nits. This difference, while not massive, translates to slightly better visibility in direct sunlight. Neither specification details refresh rate, but market data suggests the Pixel 6 Pro has an adaptive refresh rate, while the GT Neo 3 has a fixed rate. This impacts smoothness and power consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its camera capabilities, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for the GT Neo 3, the Pixel 6 Pro’s strength lies in its image processing algorithms, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system benefits from features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode, enhancing photos beyond what hardware alone can achieve. The Realme GT Neo 3’s camera is described as capable of both photo and video, but lacks the detailed specification to assess its strengths relative to the Pixel 6 Pro. The absence of details on OIS or aperture sizes hinders a thorough comparison.
Performance
The chipset is where these phones diverge significantly. The Realme GT Neo 3 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz. The Pixel 6 Pro, on the other hand, is powered by Google’s in-house Tensor chip (5nm) with a unique CPU arrangement: two Cortex-X1 cores at 2.80 GHz, two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.25 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.80 GHz. While both are 5nm chips, the Cortex-X1 cores in the Tensor offer a performance advantage in single-core tasks, crucial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. The GT Neo 3’s Dimensity 8100 excels in sustained multi-core performance, making it ideal for gaming. The lack of RAM specification requires market research, but both are expected to have LPDDR5 RAM.
Battery Life
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 84 hours, indicating strong battery life. However, the Realme GT Neo 3 compensates with its incredibly fast 80W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 32 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0, is significantly slower, taking approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Pixel 6 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent in the GT Neo 3. The trade-off is clear: the Pixel 6 Pro prioritizes longevity, while the GT Neo 3 prioritizes rapid replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo 3 if you need a phone that can rapidly replenish its battery – fully charging in just 32 minutes – and deliver consistently high frame rates in demanding games. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a more polished software experience, a class-leading camera system with Google’s AI enhancements, and longer-term software support.