Realme GT Neo 3 150W vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT boasts the more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, offering a slight edge in raw performance. However, the Realme GT Neo 3’s incredibly fast 150W charging is a game-changer. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: performance or charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3 150W | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 22 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 30 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired, 50% in 5 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue), Naruto edition | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | RMX3563, RMX3562 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Realme GT Neo 3 150W
- Incredibly fast 150W charging
- Excellent endurance rating
- Good performance for the price
- Stylish design
- Camera not as good as Poco F4 GT
- Dimensity 8100 slightly less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Versatile camera system
- Fast 120W charging
- Good value for money
- Battery life slightly lower than Realme GT Neo 3
- Design can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. While both are reported to have 'infinite' contrast ratios (likely a marketing term), real-world performance will be similar. The Poco F4 GT might have slightly better color accuracy due to Xiaomi's calibration, but the difference is minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Poco F4 GT has a more versatile camera system, likely offering better image quality in various conditions. While both phones can record video, the Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon chip typically provides better video processing capabilities. The Realme GT Neo 3's camera is decent, but not a standout feature.
Performance
The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is undeniably the performance leader. It handles demanding games and multitasking with ease. The Realme GT Neo 3's Dimensity 8100 is still a capable chip, but it doesn't quite match the raw power of the Snapdragon. Expect smoother frame rates and faster load times on the Poco F4 GT.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 3 150W takes a commanding lead in battery charging. Its 150W charging can fully charge the battery in around 5 minutes, a truly remarkable feat. The Poco F4 GT's 120W charging is still fast, but not as impressive. While the Poco F4 GT has a slightly lower endurance rating (81h vs 102h), the Realme's charging speed largely negates this difference.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo 3 150W is ideal for users who prioritize incredibly fast charging and don't mind a slightly less powerful chipset. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is a better choice for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance and a robust camera system.