Realme GT Neo 3 150W vs Realme GT2 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT2 Pro edges out the GT Neo 3 150W thanks to its superior camera system, slightly better battery life, and more refined design. However, the GT Neo 3 150W remains a compelling choice for those prioritizing incredibly fast charging speeds and a powerful chipset at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3 150W | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 22 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 30 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired, 50% in 5 min | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue), Naruto edition | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | RMX3563, RMX3562 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 3 150W
- Incredibly fast 150W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Excellent gaming performance
- Competitive price
- Camera performance not as good as GT2 Pro
- Design less premium than GT2 Pro
- Brightness not as high as GT2 Pro
Realme GT2 Pro
- Superior camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Slightly better battery life
- Brighter display
- Slower charging speed
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can throttle under load
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, but the GT2 Pro's measured 778 nits peak brightness gives it a noticeable advantage in outdoor visibility. The GT Neo 3's display is still good, but lacks the same punch. Color accuracy is generally good on both, but the GT2 Pro's calibration might be slightly more refined.
Camera Comparison
The GT2 Pro clearly wins in the camera department. While the GT Neo 3 has a decent camera setup, the GT2 Pro offers a more versatile system with better image quality, especially in low light. The GT2 Pro's image processing is also generally more pleasing.
Performance
The GT Neo 3 150W's Dimensity 8100 is a powerhouse, offering excellent gaming performance. The GT2 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is also incredibly fast, though it can sometimes exhibit thermal throttling under sustained heavy load. Day-to-day performance is smooth on both devices.
Battery Life
The GT2 Pro holds a slight advantage with an endurance rating of 117 hours compared to the GT Neo 3's 102 hours. However, the GT Neo 3's 150W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in around 20 minutes, significantly faster than the GT2 Pro's 65W charging (33 minutes).
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo 3 150W is ideal for gamers and power users who value rapid charging and a strong processor for demanding tasks. The Realme GT2 Pro is better suited for photography enthusiasts and users who appreciate a premium build quality and a more versatile camera system.