Realme GT Neo 3 150W vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing photography and a polished software experience, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the better choice. However, if you demand the fastest charging available and prioritize gaming performance, the Realme GT Neo 3 150W delivers a compelling package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo 3 150W | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 22 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 30 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired, 50% in 5 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue), Naruto edition | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | RMX3563, RMX3562 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.1 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo 3 150W
- Incredibly fast 150W charging
- Strong GPU performance for gaming
- Higher battery endurance rating
- Lacks wireless charging
- Camera likely less refined than Pixel 6 Pro
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera and image processing
- Smooth software experience with guaranteed updates
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Lower battery endurance rating
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Pixel 6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter panel, reaching 846 nits measured, crucial for outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize OLED technology, the Pixel 6 Pro’s higher brightness provides a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The Realme GT Neo 3’s display specs lack specific details like refresh rate, which the Pixel 6 Pro likely has, further enhancing smoothness.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s strength lies in its computational photography, driven by the Google Tensor chip. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 6 Pro’s reputation centers around its image processing algorithms, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. The Realme GT Neo 3’s camera system is likely geared towards a more vibrant, saturated look, common in Realme phones. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to directly compare image quality, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software advantage is a significant differentiator. The Pixel 6 Pro's focus on computational photography will likely yield better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 3 150W is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a high clock speed of 2.85 GHz on its Cortex-A78 cores. The Pixel 6 Pro utilizes Google’s in-house Tensor chip (5nm) with a unique CPU configuration including Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.80 GHz. While both are 5nm chips, the Tensor prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The GT Neo 3’s Dimensity 8100 is generally considered stronger in raw GPU performance, making it more suitable for demanding games. The Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor excels in tasks leveraging its AI capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 3 150W boasts a remarkable 150W wired charging capability, achieving 50% charge in just 5 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging, which takes 30 minutes for a 50% charge. However, the Pixel 6 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the GT Neo 3. The GT Neo 3 has an endurance rating of 102 hours, while the Pixel 6 Pro has 84 hours. While the GT Neo 3’s endurance is higher, the Pixel 6 Pro’s wireless charging options provide added convenience. The GT Neo 3’s charging speed is its defining battery feature.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo 3 150W if you need a phone that can go from 0 to 100% in under an hour, and you frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities, and a phone that excels at everyday tasks and photography.