Realme GT Master vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+: Which Snapdragon Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, efficient experience and excellent battery life, the Realme GT Master emerges as the winner. While the Redmi K40 Pro+ boasts a more powerful chipset, its faster charging is offset by a less efficient processor and potentially more thermal throttling, making the GT Master the more consistently reliable choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Master | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 21 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 30 | Available. Released 2021, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.2 mm x 73.5 mm x 8.0/8.7 mm (depending on color) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 174/180 g (depending on color) (6.14 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, White, Aurora | Black, White, Aurora |
| Models | RMX3363, RMX3360, RMX3361 | - |
| Price | $ 142.99 / € 128.55 | About 470 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.2 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 529263 (v9) GeekBench: 2917 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme GT Master
- Faster 65W charging (33 minutes)
- More efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Excellent battery endurance (114h)
- Less powerful processor than the K40 Pro+
- Camera specs are unknown, potentially less advanced
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Potentially superior camera system
- Faster processing speeds for demanding tasks
- Slower 33W charging (52 minutes)
- Snapdragon 888 prone to thermal throttling
- Potentially shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Master features a display capable of reaching 634 nits of peak brightness, providing adequate visibility outdoors. While the Redmi K40 Pro+’s display specifications aren’t provided, Xiaomi typically equips its ‘Pro’ models with high-quality panels. The GT Master’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical OLED panel, offering excellent blacks. However, without knowing the K40 Pro+'s panel type or brightness, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. The GT Master’s focus on color accuracy and brightness makes it a strong contender for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Given the market positioning, we can infer that the K40 Pro+ likely features a more sophisticated camera system. However, without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. The Redmi K40 Pro+’s higher processing power could translate to better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The GT Master will likely offer a competent camera experience, but the K40 Pro+ has the potential to deliver superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme GT Master utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), while the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ packs the more potent SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The Snapdragon 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, significantly outperforms the 778G’s Cortex-A78 (2.4 GHz). However, the 5nm process of the 888 doesn’t guarantee efficiency; it’s known to run hotter under sustained load. The 6nm process of the 778G offers a better balance of performance and thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The K40 Pro+ will undoubtedly deliver faster app loading and smoother multitasking, but the GT Master will likely maintain consistent performance for longer.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Master boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating solid battery life. It supports 65W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 33 minutes. The Redmi K40 Pro+, with 33W charging (advertised 52 minutes to full), charges significantly slower. While the K40 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 888’s higher power consumption will likely necessitate a larger battery to achieve comparable endurance. The GT Master’s faster charging and potentially more efficient chipset give it a clear advantage in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Master if you need a phone that excels in everyday tasks, offers consistently good performance without overheating, and prioritizes long-lasting battery life. It’s ideal for users who enjoy social media, streaming, and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ if you prefer maximum processing power for demanding games and applications, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and the possibility of thermal throttling during extended heavy use.