The Realme GT Master and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver flagship-level performance without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches – Realme prioritizing a balanced experience and Xiaomi leaning heavily into raw power. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience with good battery life and a brighter display, the Realme GT Master emerges as the winner. However, gamers and those demanding maximum performance will find the Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 a more compelling choice, despite its slightly lower endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 21 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 30 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 159.2 mm x 73.5 mm x 8.0/8.7 mm (depending on color) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174/180 g (depending on color) (6.14 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, White, Aurora | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | RMX3363, RMX3360, RMX3361 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | $ 142.99 / € 128.55 | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 114h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 529263 (v9)
GeekBench: 2917 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme GT Master
- Excellent battery endurance (114h)
- Faster charging (33 mins to 100%)
- Brighter display (634 nits)
- Less powerful chipset than Poco F3 GT
- Camera details are limited
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- More powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Faster charging standard support (PD3.0, QC3.0)
- Potentially higher peak gaming performance
- Slower overall charging time (42 mins)
- Likely lower battery endurance
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Master boasts a display capable of reaching 634 nits of peak brightness, making it significantly more visible outdoors than we’d expect from the Poco F3 GT (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize standard LCD panels, the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for everyday use. Contrast ratios are nominally infinite on both, typical for LCDs, but real-world viewing angles and color accuracy will likely be similar given the segment. The absence of high refresh rate information for the Poco F3 GT is a notable omission, while the Realme GT Master’s display is adequate for most users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both rely on similar mid-range sensors. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography. We can assume both will offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance is likely to be a weakness. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme GT Master utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) while the Poco F3 GT is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Dimensity 1200, with its Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offers a clear advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming compared to the Snapdragon 778G’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78. However, the Snapdragon 778G is known for its excellent efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco F3 GT’s CPU configuration (1x3.0 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz) suggests a more aggressive performance profile, while the Realme’s (1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.2 GHz + 4x1.9 GHz) aims for a balance between power and efficiency.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Master has an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating solid battery life. It supports 65W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in 33 minutes. The Poco F3 GT, with 67W wired charging (including PD3.0 and QC3.0), also promises fast charging, but takes 42 minutes to reach 100%. While the Poco’s charging wattage is higher, the Realme’s faster overall charge time suggests more efficient power delivery. The lack of battery capacity information for both phones makes it difficult to assess the impact of charging speed on real-world usage, but the Realme’s higher endurance rating suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Master if you need a phone with excellent all-day battery life, a brighter and more usable display in sunlight, and a more refined overall experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize raw gaming performance, are willing to trade some battery life for that power, and appreciate the faster charging speeds, even if it takes slightly longer to fully charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, but it's known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 778G. While the Poco F3 GT likely has thermal management features, extended gaming at maximum settings could lead to throttling, reducing sustained performance. The Realme GT Master’s Snapdragon 778G is more efficient and less prone to overheating.
❓ How does the 65W charging on the Realme GT Master compare to the 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT in real-world use?
Despite the Poco F3 GT supporting more charging standards, the Realme GT Master charges faster overall (33 minutes vs 42 minutes). This suggests the Realme’s charging implementation is more efficient, delivering a quicker top-up despite slightly lower wattage. Both phones offer significantly faster charging than many competitors.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs a major drawback for both phones?
Yes, the limited camera information is a significant drawback. It suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device. Expect acceptable image quality in good lighting, but don't anticipate flagship-level performance, especially in low-light conditions. If photography is a priority, you should consider other options.
