Realme GT Explorer Master vs. Xiaomi Poco F4: A Clash of Flagship Killers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Explorer Master edges out the Poco F4 thanks to its superior battery life and slightly brighter display. While both offer excellent performance and value, the Realme's endurance and screen brightness give it a slight advantage. However, the Poco F4's slightly faster charging and potentially more refined software experience are worth considering.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Explorer Master | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 21 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 mm x 72.5 mm x 8.0/8.8 mm (depending on color) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5/185 g (depending on color) (6.49 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 50% in 13 min, 100% in 33 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Aurora, Apricot | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | RMX3366 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 380 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 717879 (v9) GeekBench: 3050 (v5.1) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Explorer Master
- Exceptional battery life (117h endurance)
- Brighter display (805 nits)
- Fast charging (65W)
- Premium design (often with leather or unique finishes)
- Camera might not be as refined as the Poco F4
- Software updates could be less frequent
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Brighter display (1003 nits)
- Faster charging (67W)
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Competitive price
- Shorter battery life (101h endurance)
- Design might be less premium than the Realme
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate. However, the Poco F4 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, significantly higher than the Realme GT Explorer Master's 805 nits. This means the Poco F4 will be easier to see in direct sunlight. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Poco F4's brighter screen is a noticeable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera reviews suggest the Poco F4 might have a slight edge in image processing and overall consistency. The Realme GT Explorer Master's camera is still capable of producing good results, but the Poco F4's software might offer more refined images. Low-light performance is likely comparable.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 870 chipset, ensuring smooth and responsive performance for everyday tasks and demanding games. The 7nm process and Octa-core CPU provide ample power. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal, with both phones handling most tasks with ease. Software optimization will play a larger role in the overall user experience.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Explorer Master shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 117h significantly surpasses the Poco F4's 101h. This translates to noticeably longer battery life in real-world usage. While the Poco F4 charges slightly faster (38 minutes vs 33 minutes for 100%), the Realme's larger battery capacity provides a more substantial advantage.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Explorer Master is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a vibrant display. It's a great choice for those who want a phone that can last through a full day of heavy use. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is better suited for users who value faster charging speeds and potentially a more polished software experience, and who don't mind slightly shorter battery life.