Realme GT Explorer Master vs. Realme GT Neo 3: Clash of the Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 3 edges out the Explorer Master thanks to its faster charging, more modern chipset (Dimensity 8100), and slightly better overall performance. While the Explorer Master has a slightly better endurance rating, the Neo 3's advantages make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Explorer Master | Realme GT Neo 3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 21 | 2022, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 27 | Available. Released 2022, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 mm x 72.5 mm x 8.0/8.8 mm (depending on color) | 163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5/185 g (depending on color) (6.49 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 50% in 13 min, 100% in 33 min | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Aurora, Apricot | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue) |
| Models | RMX3366 | RMX3561, RMX3560 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | -27.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 717879 (v9) GeekBench: 3050 (v5.1) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 819348 (v9) GeekBench: 4079 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Explorer Master
- Excellent battery life
- Reliable Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Good display quality
- Fast 65W charging
- Slightly older chipset
- Camera could be better
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Realme GT Neo 3
- Faster charging (80W)
- More modern Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Strong performance for gaming
- Vibrant display
- Slightly lower battery endurance than Explorer Master
- Camera performance is average
- Design is somewhat generic
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with infinite contrast ratios. The GT Explorer Master boasts a marginally higher peak brightness of 805 nits compared to the GT Neo 3's 796 nits, but the difference is negligible in real-world usage. Both offer vibrant colors and smooth visuals, making them great for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two devices. Both offer capable photo and video capabilities, but neither excels significantly over the other. Image quality is good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance could be improved on both. Specific camera hardware details are missing, making a definitive winner difficult to declare.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 3 takes a clear lead in performance thanks to the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 chipset. This 5nm chip offers a noticeable performance boost over the GT Explorer Master's Snapdragon 870, especially in demanding games and multitasking scenarios. The Dimensity 8100's architecture is more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Explorer Master holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 117h endurance rating. However, the GT Neo 3 compensates with significantly faster 80W charging, reaching 100% in just 32 minutes compared to the Explorer Master's 33 minutes. The Neo 3's faster charging makes up for the slightly lower endurance.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Explorer Master is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a proven, reliable chipset (Snapdragon 870). The Realme GT Neo 3 is perfect for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance, blazing-fast charging, and a more contemporary processor.