Realme C85 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the 1047 nit peak brightness provides excellent outdoor visibility. However, the Realme C85 offers a competitive chipset and may appeal to those seeking a slightly newer processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme C85 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 02 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 77.9 x 8.4 mm (6.54 x 3.07 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1570 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1200 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | Up to 256GB | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Purple | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | RMX5253 | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | - | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Realme C85
- Newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- 6nm process for improved efficiency
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower 45W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Limited camera details available
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- 67W fast charging (50% in 16 min)
- 1047 nits peak display brightness
- Excellent battery life (11:36h active use)
- Older Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra chipset
- Potentially less efficient than 6nm process
- Camera details not fully specified
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a clear advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1047 nits. This is a substantial improvement over what we'd expect in this price bracket, making it far more usable outdoors. While the Realme C85’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to fall short of this brightness level. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s higher brightness translates to better readability and a more vibrant viewing experience, especially for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices lacks detailed camera specifications. However, given the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). While the C85 may offer a decent camera for casual photography, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is likely to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details on the Realme C85’s camera makes a definitive comparison difficult, but Xiaomi typically invests more heavily in camera technology in this segment.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek chipsets with similar CPU core configurations – an octa-core setup featuring two Cortex-A76 cores and six Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Realme C85’s Dimensity 6300, built on a 6nm process, theoretically offers better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s Helio G99 Ultra. The 6nm node allows for more transistors in a smaller space, reducing heat generation. However, the Helio G99 Ultra is a well-optimized chip, and real-world performance differences may be minimal for everyday tasks. The Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture could provide a slight edge in demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G shines in the battery and charging department. Its 67W wired charging capability can replenish the battery to 50% in just 16 minutes and fully charge it in 46 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Realme C85’s 45W charging. While the Realme C85 offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s faster charging speeds are more impactful for daily use. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G also boasts an active use score of 11:36h, indicating excellent battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C85 if you prioritize a more recent chipset and potentially longer software support, and aren't overly concerned with charging speed or peak display brightness. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you value a significantly faster charging experience, a brighter and more visible display in sunlight, and a proven track record of reliable performance from the Helio G99 platform.