Realme C85 vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Realme C85’s Dimensity 6300 and 45W charging. However, the C85 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme C85 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 02 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 77.9 x 8.4 mm (6.54 x 3.07 x 0.33 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1570 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1200 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | Up to 256GB | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Purple | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | RMX5253 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme C85
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower display brightness
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly faster processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster charging with QC/PD support
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger size and weight
- May not be ideal for extremely budget-conscious buyers
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Realme C85 (brightness data unavailable, assumed lower based on price point). While both likely utilize LCD panels given the price brackets, the X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a substantial advantage. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. However, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to offer a more versatile camera system, likely featuring a higher-resolution main sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. While both phones likely include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, the X6 Pro’s superior processing power will contribute to better image quality and faster processing times. The Realme C85’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but will likely fall short in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial leap over the Realme C85’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides significantly more processing power than the C85’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco X6 Pro will deliver a noticeably smoother experience in demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro’s active use score of 11:46h demonstrates strong battery life, likely due to the efficient Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset. While the Realme C85’s battery capacity is unknown, the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging (with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support, reaching 100% in 45 minutes) is a significant advantage over the C85’s 45W charging. The faster charging speed minimizes downtime and provides greater convenience. The C85’s inclusion of reverse wired charging is a niche feature that may appeal to users who need to charge accessories on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C85 if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for basic tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. Its 45W charging and reverse wired charging offer convenience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a smoother gaming experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and faster charging speeds, even if it means spending a bit more.