Realme C85 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and significantly faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset and 68W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Realme C85 presents a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme C85 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 02 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 13 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 77.9 x 8.4 mm (6.54 x 3.07 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1570 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1200 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | Up to 256GB | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5253 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme C85
- Aggressive pricing makes it highly accessible.
- 45W charging with reverse wired charging offers convenience.
- Mediatek Dimensity 6300 is sufficient for basic tasks.
- Likely lower display brightness impacts outdoor visibility.
- Performance lags behind the Edge 40 Neo.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 68W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
- Brighter display (1073 nits) enhances visibility.
- Dimensity 7030 offers better performance for gaming and multitasking.
- Higher price point compared to the Realme C85.
- Battery capacity not explicitly stated, potentially smaller than competitors.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Realme C85’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness, making it less usable in direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness also translates to better HDR content viewing. We can infer that the Edge 40 Neo likely uses a higher quality panel, offering better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is expected to offer a more refined camera experience. While sensor sizes are unknown, Motorola typically focuses on image processing algorithms to enhance photo quality. The Realme C85 likely prioritizes affordability over camera capabilities. The absence of details regarding OIS on either device suggests both rely on software stabilization. We can assume the Edge 40 Neo’s camera system will be more versatile and capable in low-light conditions.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a performance edge. Its CPU configuration, featuring 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores compared to the C85’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, provides a boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and responsiveness. While both have 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the A78 architecture is more efficient. The Edge 40 Neo is better suited for demanding tasks and gaming, though both phones should handle everyday tasks without issue. RAM specifications are missing for the C85, but the Edge 40 Neo’s likely LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 RAM contributes to its smoother performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. Its 68W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 15 minutes, a significant time saver. The Realme C85’s 45W charging is respectable, but noticeably slower. The Edge 40 Neo also boasts an impressive active use battery score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80h, indicating excellent battery life. While the C85’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a superior user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C85 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks and aren't heavily invested in gaming or demanding applications. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 provides sufficient power for basic use cases. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more premium experience with a brighter display, faster charging, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.