Realme C85 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the 1047 nit peak brightness offers superior outdoor visibility. However, the Realme C85 Pro remains a viable option for those seeking a slightly more power-efficient processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme C85 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 02 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 78 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2344 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~380 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 113.4 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Parrot Purple, Peacock Green | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | RMX5555 | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | - | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Realme C85 Pro
- Potentially better thermal efficiency due to 6nm process
- Stable and optimized software experience (typical of Realme)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Likely less bright display
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Brighter display (1047 nits)
- More powerful Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra chipset
- Potentially less thermal efficiency
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be resource intensive
- May have more pre-installed bloatware
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1047 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the Realme C85 Pro, making it far more usable in direct sunlight. While the Realme C85 Pro's display specs are currently unknown, the Redmi's brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience outdoors. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel, offering good color accuracy, though it lacks the dynamic refresh rates found in higher-end devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature multi-camera setups, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s camera system is likely the more versatile option, given Xiaomi’s history of incorporating larger sensors and advanced image processing. While the Realme C85 Pro may offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is expected to excel in low-light scenarios and offer more detailed photos. We anticipate the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G to have better video stabilization and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, offers a performance edge over the Realme C85 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. The Snapdragon 685’s 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 cores are clocked higher, but the Helio G99 Ultra’s newer architecture and core configuration provide better multi-core performance. The Realme C85 Pro benefits from the 6nm process node, potentially offering better thermal efficiency, but the Helio G99 Ultra’s GPU is likely more capable for gaming. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s performance will be noticeable in app loading times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s 67W wired charging is a clear win, achieving 50% charge in just 16 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Realme C85 Pro’s 45W charging. While the Realme C85 Pro may have a slightly larger battery capacity (speculation based on market trends), the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s active use score of 11:36h demonstrates excellent battery life despite the faster charging. The Redmi also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C85 Pro if you prioritize long-term battery life and a stable, well-optimized software experience, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and peak display brightness. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you value faster charging, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and a chipset geared towards slightly more demanding tasks.