Poco X6 Pro vs Realme C85 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. However, the Realme C85 Pro remains a viable option for those seeking a more efficient device with reliable, if less spectacular, performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme C85 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 02 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 78 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2344 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~380 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 113.4 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Parrot Purple, Peacock Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | RMX5555 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme C85 Pro
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the Snapdragon 685.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- 45W charging with reverse wired charging capability.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X6 Pro.
- Likely a less vibrant and dimmer display.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance thanks to the Dimensity 8300 Ultra.
- Bright and vibrant display with 1148 nits peak brightness.
- Fast 67W charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support.
- Potentially higher price.
- May experience more heat under heavy load (though the 4nm process mitigates this).
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the C85 Pro, despite the good active use score.
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Realme C85 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the C85 Pro’s panel characteristics are unknown, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability. The X6 Pro’s display is likely to offer a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially with HDR content. We expect the X6 Pro to have a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. However, we can infer that the Poco X6 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely include standard photo and video capabilities, the X6 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 8300 Ultra will enable better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The Realme C85 Pro’s camera will likely be sufficient for casual photography, but the X6 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the X6 Pro, a common feature in this price range, would further enhance its camera capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is in a different league than the Realme C85 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A715 cores versus the C85 Pro’s Cortex-A73 – and a more powerful GPU. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco X6 Pro. The Snapdragon 685 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s 4nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during prolonged gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving an active use score of 11 hours and 46 minutes. While the Realme C85 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s efficiency, combined with its 67W fast charging (capable of a full charge in 45 minutes), gives it a significant advantage. The C85 Pro’s 45W charging is respectable, but slower. The X6 Pro also supports QC2.0 and PD3.0 charging standards, offering greater compatibility with various chargers. The combination of efficient power management and rapid charging makes the Poco X6 Pro the more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C85 Pro if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on battery efficiency and are comfortable with moderate performance. It’s ideal for casual users, students, or anyone who prioritizes longevity over raw power. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and future software updates without breaking a sweat. This is the choice for power users and mobile gamers.