The Realme C75 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$200 smartphone market. Both devices leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series to deliver a balance of performance and efficiency, but key differences in battery endurance and charging speed set them apart. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to help you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Realme C75 is the better choice. Its significantly longer 65:33h battery endurance, coupled with 1000 charge cycles, outweighs the Poco X6 Neo’s slightly faster processor in most real-world scenarios. However, users focused on maximizing performance for gaming may find the Poco X6 Neo a more appealing option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 02 | 2024, March 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 08 | Available. Released 2024, March 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Lily, Purple Blossom, Lily White | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Martian Orange |
| Models | RMX3943 | MZB0GGWIN, 2312FRAFDI |
| Price | ₹ 11,990 | ₹ 18,990 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 65:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme C75
- Exceptional battery life (65:33h endurance)
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Faster 45W charging
- Potentially slightly lower peak performance compared to Poco X6 Neo
- Camera specs are currently unknown
Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 6080)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Competitive price point
- Shorter battery life (estimated)
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
Both the Realme C75 and Poco X6 Neo are expected to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are absent, the focus here isn't on display quality. The absence of high refresh rates is also standard. The user experience will likely be similar in terms of visual fidelity, making this a non-differentiating factor.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the main sensor and image processing algorithms. It's reasonable to assume both will include a standard wide lens and potentially a depth or macro sensor, though the usefulness of a 2MP macro lens is questionable. Image processing style will likely differ between Realme and Xiaomi, impacting color science and dynamic range.
Performance
Both phones utilize an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement: 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the chipset differs – the Realme C75 employs the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), while the Poco X6 Neo uses the Dimensity 6080 (6nm). While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 6300 generally offers a slight performance advantage in benchmarks, though the real-world difference will be minimal for everyday tasks. Neither phone is expected to excel at demanding gaming, but both should handle popular titles at medium settings. The lack of LPDDR5X RAM specification suggests both likely use LPDDR4X, limiting memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
This is where the Realme C75 truly shines. Its 65:33h endurance rating significantly surpasses the expected battery life of the Poco X6 Neo (no endurance data provided, but likely lower). The C75 also boasts 1000 charge cycles, indicating a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation. The Realme C75 supports 45W wired charging, allowing for a quicker 0-100% charge compared to the Poco X6 Neo’s 33W charging. The C75 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C75 if you need a phone that will reliably last through a full day – and beyond – of moderate use, and if long-term battery health is a concern given the 1000 charge cycle rating. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo if you prioritize slightly quicker app loading times and responsiveness, and are comfortable with potentially more frequent charging, accepting the trade-off for a marginally more powerful chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Realme C75's 45W charging significantly reduce battery degradation compared to the Poco X6 Neo's 33W?
While faster charging doesn't inherently *cause* more degradation, the Realme C75's 1000 charge cycle rating suggests a more robust battery management system and potentially a higher quality battery cell, contributing to longer-term battery health. The slower charging of the Poco X6 Neo isn't necessarily detrimental, but the C75 offers an added layer of protection against degradation over time.
❓ Will the Dimensity 6080 in the Poco X6 Neo provide a noticeable gaming advantage over the Dimensity 6300 in the Realme C75?
The performance difference between the Dimensity 6080 and 6300 is relatively small. While the Poco X6 Neo might exhibit slightly faster frame rates in some games, the difference will likely be minimal and may not be noticeable during typical gameplay. Both phones are best suited for playing games at medium settings.
❓ Is the 5W reverse wired charging on the Realme C75 useful for everyday accessories?
Yes, the 5W reverse wired charging is a convenient feature for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch. While it's not a fast charging solution, it can provide a small boost to these devices when you're away from a power outlet.
