The Realme C75 and vivo V30e represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The Realme C75 prioritizes endurance and a robust processor, while the vivo V30e focuses on efficiency with a newer chipset fabrication process. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Realme C75 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset, coupled with a 65:33h endurance rating, offers a more reliable experience for demanding tasks and extended usage, despite the vivo V30e's more efficient fabrication.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Malaysia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Malaysia |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Malaysia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 02 | 2024, May 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 08 | Available. Released 2024, May 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back or plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 74.8 x 7.7 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 179 g or 188 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Schott Xensation |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS (India only)
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), AF - India
32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide) - Malaysia |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (India only), 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
5W reverse wired | 44W wired, PD
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Lily, Purple Blossom, Lily White | Velvet Red (Coco Brown), Silk Blue, Sky Mirror |
| Models | RMX3943 | V2339 |
| Price | ₹ 11,990 | ₹ 23,999 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 65:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme C75
- Superior CPU performance due to Cortex-A76 cores
- Exceptional battery life (65:33h endurance)
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Less efficient 6nm fabrication process compared to the vivo V30e
- Potential for slightly more heat generation under sustained load
vivo V30e
- More power-efficient 4nm fabrication process
- PD charging support for wider compatibility
- Potentially smoother performance in light tasks
- Inferior CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 vs A76)
- Lower battery endurance rating
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so we must infer. Given the price points, both devices likely feature LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. However, the Realme C75, being positioned as a slightly more performance-focused device, *may* have a slightly higher peak brightness. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both likely stick to the standard 60Hz, prioritizing battery life over visual fluidity. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, so analysis relies on brand tendencies. Both brands typically employ a multi-camera system with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. However, given the focus on value, sensor sizes are likely similar. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s ISP *may* offer slightly better image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions, due to Qualcomm’s established expertise. However, without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. We can assume both will offer acceptable, but not exceptional, camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme C75’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This contrasts with the vivo V30e’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) which employs a 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. While the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 benefits from a more advanced 4nm process – promising better thermal efficiency – the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores are architecturally superior to the A78 cores in the Snapdragon, potentially offering a performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 6300 still provides good efficiency, and the larger core count could benefit multitasking.
Battery Life
The Realme C75 boasts a 65:33h endurance rating, indicating excellent battery life. Coupled with 45W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging, it provides both longevity and relatively quick top-ups. The vivo V30e offers 44W wired charging with PD support and reverse wired charging. While the wattage is slightly lower, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s 4nm process *should* contribute to improved power efficiency. However, the Realme C75’s significantly higher endurance rating suggests its battery optimization and capacity outweigh the efficiency gains of the vivo V30e.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C75 if you need a phone that can handle extended gaming sessions or heavy multitasking without significant performance drops, and if battery life is paramount. Buy the vivo V30e if you prioritize a slightly more power-efficient chipset and potentially smoother performance in less demanding tasks, and appreciate the inclusion of PD charging support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 6300 in the Realme C75 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 6300 is a capable chipset, Genshin Impact is notoriously demanding. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently playable framerate. The Realme C75's endurance rating will be beneficial during longer gaming sessions, but some throttling is still possible.
❓ Does the vivo V30e's 44W charging with PD offer significantly faster charging speeds compared to standard 44W chargers?
Yes, Power Delivery (PD) allows the vivo V30e to negotiate a higher voltage and current with compatible chargers, potentially resulting in faster charging speeds. However, the difference won't be dramatic unless you're using a high-wattage PD charger. The Realme C75's 45W charging is still competitive.
❓ How does the 6nm vs 4nm process node affect the long-term performance of these phones?
The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 generally leads to better thermal efficiency, meaning the phone is less likely to overheat under sustained load. This can translate to more consistent performance over time. However, the Realme C75's larger battery and potentially more aggressive cooling solutions could mitigate the impact of the 6nm process.
