The Realme C75 and Oppo F25 Pro both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, relying on MediaTek's Dimensity series to deliver a balance of performance and efficiency. However, they diverge in key areas like chipset choice and charging technology, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Oppo F25 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset, coupled with 67W charging, provides a noticeable advantage over the Realme C75's Dimensity 6300 and 45W charging, despite the C75's impressive battery endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 02 | 2024, February 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 08 | Available. Released 2024, March 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 100% in 48 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Lily, Purple Blossom, Lily White | Ocean Blue, Lava Red |
| Models | RMX3943 | - |
| Price | ₹ 11,990 | ₹ 22,799 |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 65:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme C75
- Exceptional battery endurance (65:33h)
- Long-term battery health with 1000 charge cycles
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 6300)
- Slower charging speed (45W)
Oppo F25 Pro
- Faster and more efficient chipset (Dimensity 7050)
- Significantly faster charging (67W with PD2.0/QC3)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to C75
- Likely a higher price tag
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the price points, both devices likely utilize LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. The Oppo F25 Pro, being positioned slightly higher, *may* feature a higher peak brightness or a slightly more refined color calibration. Bezels are likely comparable, and neither phone is expected to offer high refresh rate panels.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, making a detailed analysis challenging. However, based on market trends, the Oppo F25 Pro is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system. While both will likely include a primary sensor, the F25 Pro may benefit from a larger sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Realme C75 may focus on a more cost-effective setup, potentially sacrificing image quality in challenging conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F25 Pro’s Dimensity 7050, featuring 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Realme C75’s Dimensity 6300 with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The A78 cores are a generation newer and more efficient, translating to better sustained performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both are built on a 6nm process, the F25 Pro will exhibit superior multi-core performance. The identical 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores suggest similar performance in light tasks. RAM configurations are unknown, but LPDDR5X support on the F25 Pro would further enhance its performance edge.
Battery Life
The Realme C75 boasts a commendable 65:33h endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Oppo F25 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging. The 67W wired charging, supporting PD2.0 and QC3, promises a full charge in just 48 minutes, a substantial improvement over the C75’s 45W charging. The C75’s 1000 charge cycle claim indicates a focus on long-term battery health, but the F25 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the need for frequent top-ups, potentially reducing overall battery degradation over time. Both offer 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C75 if you prioritize exceptional battery life and are willing to trade some processing power for it. This phone is ideal for users who heavily rely on their device throughout the day and don't engage in demanding gaming. Buy the Oppo F25 Pro if you value faster performance for multitasking and gaming, and appreciate the convenience of significantly quicker charging times. This is the better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7050 in the Oppo F25 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Dimensity 7050 is a capable chipset and should handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. However, sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling, so expect some frame drops during extended gaming sessions. The Realme C75's Dimensity 6300 will struggle with the same settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo F25 Pro compared to the 45W charging on the Realme C75 in real-world use?
The Oppo F25 Pro's 67W charging can take the battery from 0% to 100% in approximately 48 minutes, while the Realme C75's 45W charging will likely take over an hour and fifteen minutes. This translates to a significant time saving, especially for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Realme C75's 1000 charge cycle claim mean the battery will last significantly longer than the Oppo F25 Pro's?
While 1000 charge cycles is a positive indicator, battery degradation is influenced by many factors, including charging habits and usage patterns. The Oppo F25 Pro's faster charging may actually *reduce* overall degradation, as the phone spends less time at 100% charge, which is a key contributor to battery health decline.
