The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme C73 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G are two strong contenders. The C73 focuses on a streamlined experience with a newer chipset, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G prioritizes a vibrant display and incredibly fast charging. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of features and speed, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its significantly faster 67W charging and brighter display outweigh the C73’s newer chipset, offering a more polished and convenient daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 02 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 02 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Green, Crystal Purple, Onyx Black | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | - | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | ₹ 10,228 | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Realme C73
- Newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset offers potential efficiency gains.
- 6nm process node may lead to better thermal management.
- 5W reverse wired charging for topping up accessories.
- Significantly slower 15W charging.
- Display brightness data unavailable, likely inferior to Redmi.
- Camera specifications largely unknown.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- 67W fast charging – 0-100% in 46 minutes.
- Bright 1047 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Proven performance of the Helio G99 Ultra chipset.
- Older 12nm process node compared to the Dimensity 6300.
- Chipset may throttle under sustained heavy load.
- Camera quality dependent on sensor size and image processing.
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1047 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Realme C73, which lacks published brightness data. While the C73’s panel type isn’t specified, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s brightness suggests a high-quality IPS LCD. The Redmi’s superior brightness translates to a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are missing for both devices, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is likely to offer a more versatile camera system based on Xiaomi’s typical approach. While both likely feature a primary camera, the Redmi’s brand reputation suggests a focus on image processing and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Realme C73’s camera capabilities are less predictable without further information. It’s safe to assume both will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Redmi is expected to deliver superior image quality and detail.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek chipsets with similar CPU core configurations (2x Cortex-A76 and 6x Cortex-A55). However, the Realme C73’s Dimensity 6300, built on a 6nm process, theoretically offers better power efficiency than the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s Helio G99 Ultra. The 6nm node allows for more transistors in the same area, potentially leading to improved performance at lower power consumption. However, the Helio G99 Ultra is a well-established performer, and the real-world performance difference will likely be subtle in everyday tasks. Neither chipset is geared towards demanding gaming, but the G99 Ultra’s slightly higher clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz) might provide a marginal edge in CPU-bound tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G shines in the battery department with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 16 minutes and 100% in 46 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Realme C73’s slow 15W charging. While the C73’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s active use score of 11:36h demonstrates excellent battery life. The faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C73 if you prioritize a newer processor architecture and potentially longer software support, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you value a brighter, more visually appealing display, incredibly fast charging, and a proven track record of reliable performance in the mid-range segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G99 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G99 Ultra is known to throttle under sustained heavy load due to its 12nm process. While it can handle casual gaming, demanding titles at high settings for extended periods may result in noticeable performance drops as the chip heats up. The Realme C73’s 6nm Dimensity 6300 *may* offer slightly better thermal performance, but neither phone is a gaming powerhouse.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G compared to the Realme C73’s 15W charging in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G can reach a full charge in approximately 46 minutes, while the Realme C73 will take well over two hours with its 15W charger. This means you can quickly top up the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G during short breaks, whereas the C73 requires overnight charging for a full battery.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Realme C73 a cause for concern?
Yes, it is. In the budget segment, camera performance is often a key differentiator. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or image processing capabilities, it’s difficult to assess the C73’s camera quality. Xiaomi typically invests heavily in camera technology, making the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G the safer bet for photography enthusiasts.
