The Realme C73 and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The C73 aims for aggressive affordability, while the A55 prioritizes a more refined experience with a stronger emphasis on display quality and processing power. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, all-around experience and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the clear winner. Its Exynos 1480 chipset and superior battery life justify the price premium over the Realme C73, which focuses on delivering essential features at a lower cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 02 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 02 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Green, Crystal Purple, Onyx Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | - | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 10,228 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Realme C73
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Likely lower display quality
- Less powerful processor
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter, higher-quality display
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Longer battery life and faster charging
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Samsung)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to the Realme C73’s unspecified peak brightness (likely considerably lower based on its market positioning). This difference translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the C73’s panel type isn’t specified, the A55’s likely utilizes Super AMOLED technology, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A55’s higher brightness and AMOLED panel will be particularly beneficial for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Realme C73, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically invests heavily in image processing, and the A55 likely benefits from this. While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the A55’s image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor size (not specified) will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 (assumed based on Samsung’s mid-range offerings) further enhances image clarity and stability.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset offers a substantial performance advantage over the Realme C73’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – is more powerful than the C73’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 4nm process node of the Exynos 1480 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. This means the A55 will maintain higher performance levels for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 13 hours and 27 minutes. While the Realme C73’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 15W wired charging is significantly slower than the A55’s 25W charging. This means the A55 will not only last longer on a single charge but also recharge faster, minimizing downtime. The A55’s more efficient chipset also contributes to its superior battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C73 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely tight. You'll appreciate its affordability and decent performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more premium experience with a brighter display, faster processing for gaming and multitasking, and longer battery life, even if it means spending more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, is generally efficient and manages heat well. While some warmth is expected during intensive gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling like older Exynos chips. The A55’s thermal design should adequately dissipate heat for sustained gaming, offering a smoother experience than the C73’s Dimensity 6300.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget and mid-range phones offer limited utility. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-quality macro photography from either the Realme C73 or the Samsung Galaxy A55. The A55’s overall camera system is more capable, but the macro lens remains a weak point.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A55 reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Samsung Galaxy A55, powered by the Exynos 1480, should be able to maintain 60fps in PUBG Mobile at medium to high graphics settings. The processor’s Cortex-A78 cores provide sufficient power for smooth gameplay. However, achieving consistently high frame rates may require adjusting graphics settings based on individual game demands and thermal conditions.
