The Realme C67 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R represent a fascinating intersection in the budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The C67 leverages MediaTek's Dimensity 6100+ while the Note 13R opts for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2, creating a direct chipset battle that dictates overall performance and efficiency.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and potentially better long-term software support, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge and improved thermal management compared to the Realme C67's Dimensity 6100+.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 14 | 2024, May 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 16 | Available. Released 2024, May 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f2.1, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5030 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunny Oasis, Dark Purple | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | - | 2406ERN9CC |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 180 EUR |
Realme C67
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds for quick tasks.
- Competitive 33W fast charging.
- Realme UI offers a customizable experience.
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 6100+ chipset.
- Potential for thermal throttling during extended gaming.
- MediaTek's software update support can be inconsistent.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 chipset.
- Superior sustained performance and thermal management.
- Potentially better software update support from Xiaomi.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds compared to the C67.
- MIUI can be resource-intensive.
- May include pre-installed bloatware.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on chipsets, we can infer both likely feature similar LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of details like refresh rate or peak brightness suggests a focus on cost optimization. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for the segment. The user experience will be similar on both, prioritizing functionality over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature a primary sensor around 50MP. The image processing algorithms will be the key differentiator. Xiaomi’s MIUI typically emphasizes vibrant, saturated colors, while Realme’s UI often aims for a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. Any secondary cameras (ultrawide, macro) are likely to be of limited quality on both devices.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R’s Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 (4nm) holds a significant advantage over the Realme C67’s Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) in terms of process node. The 4nm process inherently leads to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling. While the C67’s CPU has slightly higher peak clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz), the Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, which offer superior performance per clock cycle compared to the C67’s Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive gaming experience on the Redmi Note 13R. The GPU performance will also favor the Snapdragon, allowing for higher frame rates in demanding titles.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 33W wired charging, with the Realme C67 claiming a 50% charge in 29 minutes. The Redmi Note 13R likely offers similar charging speeds. The battery capacity is not specified, but given the segment, both are likely in the 5000mAh range. The Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2’s superior power efficiency will likely translate to slightly longer battery life on the Redmi Note 13R, even with a similar capacity, offsetting any potential advantage from a slightly larger battery on the C67.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C67 if you prioritize a slightly higher CPU clock speed for bursty tasks and are comfortable with MediaTek's software update track record. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R if you value sustained performance during gaming, better power efficiency thanks to the 4nm process, and potentially more consistent software updates from Xiaomi, especially if you're a fan of MIUI.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 in the Redmi Note 13R handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process and improved GPU architecture contribute to better thermal management, preventing significant throttling during extended gaming sessions, unlike the Dimensity 6100+ which may experience more performance drops.
❓ How does the software update policy differ between Realme and Xiaomi for these devices?
Xiaomi generally offers a more consistent and longer software update commitment compared to Realme, particularly for security patches. While both brands are improving, Xiaomi's MIUI typically receives updates for a longer period. Realme's update schedule can be less predictable, potentially leaving the C67 with older software versions sooner.
❓ Is the 33W charging on both phones equally fast in real-world usage?
While both phones advertise 33W charging, the Redmi Note 13R's more efficient chipset may allow for slightly faster overall charging times due to reduced heat generation. The Realme C67 might throttle charging speed to manage temperature, potentially extending the 0-100% charge time.
