The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme C67 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo are two strong contenders vying for dominance. Both devices leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series to deliver 5G connectivity and respectable performance, but key differences in CPU clock speeds and overall design philosophy make choosing between them a nuanced decision. This comparison breaks down every aspect to help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and slightly faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo emerges as the winner. Its marginally faster CPU clock speeds in the Dimensity 6080 chipset provide a noticeable edge in demanding tasks, while both phones offer comparable battery life and 33W charging. However, the Realme C67 remains a compelling option for those seeking a balanced package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 14 | 2024, March 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 16 | Available. Released 2024, March 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunny Oasis, Dark Purple | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Martian Orange |
| Models | - | MZB0GGWIN, 2312FRAFDI |
| Price | About 390 EUR | ₹ 18,990 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
Realme C67
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Realme UI)
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Fast 33W charging
- Slightly slower CPU clock speed compared to Poco X6 Neo
- Camera image processing may be less vibrant
Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo
- Faster CPU clock speed for improved performance
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Fast 33W charging
- MIUI software can be resource-intensive
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some users
Display Comparison
Both the Realme C67 and Poco X6 Neo are expected to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on the processing power impacting UI smoothness. The display quality will likely be similar, with the user experience being more dependent on the chipset's ability to render graphics efficiently.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely employ a primary camera sensor paired with auxiliary lenses. The image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator. Xiaomi's MIUI is known for its vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, image processing, while Realme typically aims for a more natural look. Users who prefer punchy colors might lean towards the Poco X6 Neo, while those seeking accuracy may prefer the Realme C67. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage, but is unlikely in this price range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme C67 utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ while the Poco X6 Neo features the Dimensity 6080. Both are 6nm chips, offering good efficiency, but the Poco X6 Neo boasts a slightly higher CPU clock speed – 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus 2.2 GHz in the C67. This 200MHz difference, coupled with identical Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, translates to a measurable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and potentially smoother multitasking on the Poco X6 Neo. The GPU performance is expected to be similar, but the CPU boost will be more noticeable in everyday use.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 33W wired charging, with the Realme C67 claiming a 50% charge in 29 minutes. The Poco X6 Neo offers similar charging speeds. While battery capacity isn't specified, both are likely in the 5000mAh range, providing all-day battery life for moderate usage. The slightly more efficient Dimensity 6080 in the Poco X6 Neo *could* translate to marginally longer battery life, but the difference will likely be minimal in real-world scenarios. The 33W charging ensures relatively quick top-ups for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C67 if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on consistent performance and a clean software experience. It's ideal for users who prioritize stability and don't push their phones to the absolute limit. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo if you prefer a phone geared towards gaming and multitasking, benefiting from the slightly higher CPU clock speeds of the Dimensity 6080. This phone is best for users who demand a bit more responsiveness and are comfortable with Xiaomi's MIUI software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X6 Neo's Dimensity 6080 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The Dimensity 6080 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings, but you may need to compromise on frame rates for sustained gameplay. Expect playable performance at balanced settings with medium to high frame rates. Thermal throttling could become a factor during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the software on the Realme C67 significantly less cluttered than on the Poco X6 Neo?
Realme UI is generally considered to be closer to stock Android than Xiaomi's MIUI. MIUI often includes pre-installed apps (bloatware) and a more customized interface. If you prefer a cleaner, less intrusive software experience, the Realme C67 is likely the better choice.
❓ How does the 33W charging compare to faster charging technologies found in more expensive phones?
While 33W charging isn't the fastest available, it's still a respectable charging speed for this price range. It will fully charge the phone in approximately 60-90 minutes. Compared to 65W or 120W charging, it's slower, but it's sufficient for overnight charging or quick top-ups throughout the day.
