The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Realme C67, powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+, aims to deliver strong performance at an aggressive price. However, Samsung’s Galaxy A35 counters with a brighter display and the in-house Exynos 1380 chipset. This comparison dissects these two contenders to determine which offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant viewing experience and reliable all-day battery life, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is the stronger choice. Its brighter 1024 nit display and impressive 12:26h active use battery score outweigh the Realme C67’s faster charging and slightly more efficient chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 14 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 16 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f2.1, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunny Oasis, Dark Purple | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | - | SM-A356E, SM-A356E/DS, SM-A356B, SM-A356B/DS, SM-A356U, SM-A356U1 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 138.00 / C$ 419.99 / £ 205.99 / € 259.99 / ₹ 18,299 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.44 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
Realme C67
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially more efficient chipset (Dimensity 6100+).
- Aggressive pricing for the performance offered.
- Likely lower peak display brightness.
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Exynos 1380.
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Brighter 1024 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- More powerful Exynos 1380 chipset for smoother performance.
- Impressive 12:26h active use battery life.
- Slower 25W charging.
- Potentially higher price point.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A35 immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1024 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Realme C67 (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this price bracket). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, Samsung’s higher peak brightness and potentially superior color calibration provide a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, impacting battery life during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically emphasizes image processing and software optimization. The A35 likely benefits from Samsung’s established algorithms for color accuracy and dynamic range. The Realme C67 may rely more on hardware, but without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. It’s safe to assume both devices include standard features like portrait modes and night modes, but the A35’s processing pipeline likely delivers more consistent results.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A35’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) chipset boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Realme C67’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1380 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Realme C67’s Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) is efficient, the A35’s chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A35’s 12:26h active use battery score is a significant advantage. While the Realme C67’s battery capacity is unknown, the A35’s endurance demonstrates superior optimization and efficiency. The C67 compensates with 33W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 29 minutes, while the A35’s 25W charging is slower. However, the A35’s longer battery life may negate the need for frequent fast charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C67 if you prioritize raw processing speed for demanding apps and games, and value faster 33W charging for quick top-ups. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask or play graphically intensive mobile titles. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A35 if you prefer a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use, and need a phone that consistently lasts through a full day of moderate to heavy use. It’s the better option for media consumption and everyday productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A35 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1380’s 5nm fabrication process and Samsung’s thermal management solutions generally prevent significant overheating. While some warmth is expected during extended gaming, it’s unlikely to cause severe throttling or performance degradation, offering a more consistent experience than some competing chipsets.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited detail and image quality. They often struggle with sharpness and dynamic range. While they can be fun to experiment with, don’t expect professional-level macro photography from either the Realme C67 or the Samsung Galaxy A35.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A35 reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A35 should be capable of maintaining 60fps in PUBG Mobile at medium to high graphics settings. However, achieving consistently smooth frame rates at the highest settings may require some optimization within the game itself, and may be affected by background processes.
❓ How does the charging speed difference (33W vs 25W) translate to real-world usage scenarios?
The Realme C67’s 33W charging is noticeably faster, reaching 50% in 29 minutes. The A35’s 25W charging will take longer. However, the A35’s superior battery life means you may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.
