The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Realme C65, powered by the Mediatek Helio G85, aims for solid all-around performance. The vivo Y200+, however, brings a newer, more efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 to the table. This comparison breaks down which phone offers the best value for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and charging speed.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y200+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the Realme C65’s Helio G85. While charging speeds are comparable, the Y200+’s reverse wired charging adds a layer of convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 02 | 2025, January 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2025, January 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 625 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple Nebula, Black Milky Way | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot |
| Models | RMX3910 | - |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Realme C65
- Potentially lower price point
- Proven chipset with established compatibility
- 45W fast charging
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Likely more thermal throttling under load
- No reverse charging
vivo Y200+
- More efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset (4nm)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially better image processing
- May be slightly more expensive
- Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is a newer platform, potential for minor software quirks
- 44W charging is marginally slower than C65
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on peak brightness or color accuracy, but rather on usability. Without specific display specs, we can assume both offer adequate viewing experiences for everyday tasks. The absence of high refresh rates is expected, prioritizing battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is almost certain on both. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, potentially leading to better noise reduction and dynamic range in photos and videos. The Realme C65 will likely lean on its established camera algorithms, but the Y200+ has the potential for superior image processing thanks to its newer chipset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y200+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Realme C65’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm). The 4nm fabrication process inherently delivers better power efficiency, translating to longer battery life and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 also features newer CPU cores – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 vs the C65’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 – offering a performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. While both are octa-core designs, the architectural improvements in the Snapdragon chip will be noticeable in app loading times and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones offer competitive charging speeds – 45W for the Realme C65 and 44W for the vivo Y200+. The Y200+ claims a 50% charge in 36 minutes, providing a concrete benchmark. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s superior efficiency means the Y200+ will likely extract more usage from a similar battery capacity compared to the C65. Furthermore, the Y200+ includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the C65, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C65 if you prioritize a proven, if slightly older, chipset with a track record of compatibility and are looking for the absolute lowest price point. Buy the vivo Y200+ if you value a more modern, efficient processor, potentially longer battery life, and the added utility of reverse wireless charging, even if it means spending a little more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y200+ handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is a capable chipset for casual gaming. PUBG Mobile should be playable at medium settings with stable frame rates. However, don't expect flagship-level performance; demanding graphics settings may lead to some frame drops. The Helio G85 in the Realme C65 will likely struggle more with consistent performance in graphically intensive games.
❓ How useful is the reverse wired charging feature on the vivo Y200+ in real-world scenarios?
Reverse wired charging is surprisingly convenient for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches when you're away from a power outlet. While it won't fully charge another phone quickly, it can provide a crucial emergency boost. The Realme C65 lacks this feature entirely.
❓ Does the difference in charging wattage (45W vs 44W) between the Realme C65 and vivo Y200+ translate to a noticeable difference in charging speed?
The 1W difference in charging wattage is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use. Both phones offer fast charging capabilities, and the overall charging time will depend more on battery capacity and charging protocols than the slight wattage difference. The Y200+'s claimed 50% charge in 36 minutes is a good indicator of its charging performance.
