The Realme C65 and Motorola Moto G84 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. The C65 focuses on rapid charging and a streamlined experience, while the Moto G84 prioritizes 5G connectivity and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more visible display and 5G connectivity, the Motorola Moto G84 is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, while not a performance leader, offers a more efficient architecture than the Helio G85, and the measured 996 nits peak brightness is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 02 | 2023, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 166.8 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 625 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple Nebula, Black Milky Way | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Models | RMX3910 | XT2347, XT2347-1, XT2347-2 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | $ 399.00 / £ 189.99 / € 169.00 |
Realme C65
- Faster 45W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Streamlined software experience (typical of Realme)
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Missing 5G connectivity
Motorola Moto G84
- Brighter 996 nits display for outdoor use
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Longer battery endurance (12:31h active use)
- Slower 30W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Motorola's software can be bloatware-heavy
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G84 boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 996 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for budget phones. While the Realme C65’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match the G84’s brightness. The G84’s panel likely offers a more pleasant viewing experience in direct sunlight. We can infer that the G84's display is likely LCD, given the price point, but the high brightness is still noteworthy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Realme C65. The Moto G84’s camera performance will likely be the stronger of the two, assuming a reasonably sized main sensor (typical for this price range). The absence of details on the C65’s camera suggests it may not be a primary selling point. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but image quality will likely differ due to the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities.
Performance
The chipset is where the most substantial difference lies. The Motorola Moto G84 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), built on a more modern and efficient 6nm process compared to the Realme C65’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). This translates to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores, offers a slight clock speed advantage over the C65’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Snapdragon 695 provide a noticeable edge in real-world responsiveness and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G84 demonstrates superior battery endurance with an active use score of 12:31h and an endurance rating of 117h. While the Realme C65’s battery capacity is unknown, the Moto G84’s longer endurance suggests a more efficient combination of hardware and software optimization. The C65 compensates with 45W wired charging, significantly faster than the G84’s 30W charging. This means the C65 can replenish its battery much quicker, even if the overall capacity is smaller.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C65 if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and prioritize a simple, uncluttered software experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t heavily rely on demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Moto G84 if you prefer a brighter display for outdoor visibility, require 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, and value longer battery endurance during active use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G84 struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but it's playable. The Helio G85 in the C65 will likely offer similar performance, but may throttle more quickly due to its less efficient architecture.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Realme C65 compared to the 30W charging on the Moto G84?
The 45W charging on the C65 will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times aren't available, expect the C65 to charge from empty to full approximately 30-45 minutes faster than the Moto G84. This is a major benefit for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Moto G84 actually useful if I don't live in an area with widespread 5G coverage?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Moto G84's 5G modem provides future-proofing. It also supports 4G LTE, and the more modern modem generally offers improved 4G performance compared to older modems. The 5G capability adds resale value as 5G networks expand.
