The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme C63 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo are two contenders vying for your attention. The C63 aims for all-around value, while the Poco X6 Neo prioritizes performance with a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset, built on a 6nm process, delivers noticeably faster performance than the Realme C63’s Unisoc Tiger T612. While the C63 offers 45W charging, the X6 Neo’s superior processing power provides a better overall user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 31 | 2024, March 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 05 | Available. Released 2024, March 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.7 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g or 191 g (6.67 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Leather Blue, Jade Green | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Martian Orange |
| Models | - | MZB0GGWIN, 2312FRAFDI |
| Price | £ 98.00 / ₹ 8,132 | ₹ 18,990 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
Realme C63
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Balanced feature set
- Less powerful Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset
- 12nm process less efficient
- Likely slower app loading times
Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset
- 6nm process for better efficiency
- Superior CPU and GPU performance
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Potentially higher price
- May require more careful thermal management
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) necessitates a focus on processing power to drive a smoother UI experience. The Poco X6 Neo’s more powerful GPU will likely translate to better performance in graphically intensive apps, even on a similar panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 6080’s ISP is likely more advanced than the one found in the Unisoc Tiger T612, resulting in better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors, the Poco X6 Neo will likely produce more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Neo’s Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Realme C63’s Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Dimensity 6080 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer. The CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 vs 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 – further favors the Poco X6 Neo, providing a noticeable boost in single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Realme C63’s 45W wired charging is faster than the Poco X6 Neo’s 33W. This means quicker top-ups, potentially reducing downtime. However, the Dimensity 6080’s superior power efficiency could offset the charging speed difference. The 6nm process consumes less power, potentially leading to comparable or even better battery life on the Poco X6 Neo despite the slower charging speed. Real-world usage will determine the ultimate winner, but the efficiency advantage is significant.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C63 if you prioritize a balanced feature set and potentially lower upfront cost, and your primary use case revolves around basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo if you value smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X6 Neo’s Dimensity 6080 get hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 6080 is a powerful chip, the 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The Poco X6 Neo likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but performance may decrease slightly after prolonged use. It's unlikely to overheat to the point of being unusable, but expect some performance dip.
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the Realme C63 sufficient for playing popular games like Call of Duty: Mobile?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 can run Call of Duty: Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering and lag, especially in intense multiplayer matches. The Poco X6 Neo offers a significantly smoother gaming experience with its more powerful chipset.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Realme C63 compared to the Poco X6 Neo in real-world use?
The 12W difference in charging wattage translates to roughly 15-20 minutes faster full charge on the Realme C63. However, the Poco X6 Neo’s more efficient chipset may reduce the overall time spent plugged in due to longer battery life between charges.
