The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and Realme consistently delivers compelling options. The Realme C35 and Narzo 50A Prime are two such contenders, offering attractive features at affordable prices. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme C35 edges out the Narzo 50A Prime thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better design. However, the Narzo 50A Prime might offer a better value proposition depending on current pricing and specific features you prioritize. Both are solid budget choices.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 10 | 2022, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 14 | Available. Released 2022, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Green | Black, Blue |
| Models | RMX3511 | RMX3516, RMX3517 |
| Price | £ 129.99 / ₹ 7,999 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | - |
Realme C35
- Slightly more powerful chipset (T616)
- Potentially higher price than Narzo 50A Prime
- Camera performance may not be significantly better
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- Potentially better value for money
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slightly less powerful chipset (T612)
- Design might be less modern
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.5-inch LCD displays with a resolution of 1600 x 720 pixels (HD+). Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use, but don't expect flagship-level quality. The C35 might have a slightly more modern design with a flatter display, potentially improving the in-hand feel.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary 50MP main camera, a 2MP depth sensor, and a 2MP macro lens. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. The C35 might have slightly improved image processing due to potential software updates or optimizations. Low-light performance will be average on both devices.
Performance
The Realme C35 holds a slight advantage here. Its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset boasts a pair of Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, compared to the Narzo 50A Prime's 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. While both utilize the same Cortex-A55 cores, the higher clock speed on the C35 should translate to marginally better performance in demanding tasks and multitasking. Expect both to handle basic apps and social media with ease, but gaming might be limited to less intensive titles.
Battery Life
Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. Charging speeds are identical at 18W wired charging, so expect similar charging times. Battery optimization will play a crucial role in real-world performance.
Buying Guide
The Realme C35 is ideal for users who prioritize a slightly smoother performance and a more modern design. The Realme Narzo 50A Prime is a great pick for those seeking a reliable, budget-friendly phone with a focus on essential features and potentially a lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme C35 worth the extra money compared to the Narzo 50A Prime?
It depends on your priorities. If you want slightly better performance, the C35 is worth considering. If you're on a tight budget, the Narzo 50A Prime offers excellent value.
❓ Can I play games on these phones?
Both phones can handle casual games, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings and could experience lag.
