Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't compromise too much? The Realme C33 2023 and Realme C55 are strong contenders, offering a blend of features and affordability. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme C55 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more powerful chipset. While the C33 2023 is a decent option, the C55 offers a more premium experience and better overall performance for a slight price increase.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 14 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 14 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.7 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI S | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sandy Gold, Aqua Blue, Night Sea | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | RMX3627 | RMX3710 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme C33 2023
- Very affordable
- Long battery life
- Sleek design
- Slow charging
- Underpowered chipset
- Dim display
Realme C55
- Fast charging (33W)
- Brighter display
- More powerful chipset
- Stylish design
- Slightly more expensive
- Battery life, while good, not dramatically better than C33
Display Comparison
The Realme C55 boasts a noticeable advantage with its 659 nits max brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. Both phones share a 1264:1 contrast ratio, indicating good color reproduction, but the C55's brightness elevates the viewing experience. The C33 2023's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy of the C55.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the C55 likely has a more refined camera system due to its more powerful chipset and potentially better image processing algorithms. Expect slightly better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the C55. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Realme C55's MediaTek Helio G88 chipset provides a significant performance boost over the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the C33 2023. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the C55. The C33 2023 is sufficient for basic tasks but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones claim an endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Realme C55's 33W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing it to reach 50% charge in just 29 minutes – a stark contrast to the C33 2023's slow 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Realme C33 2023 is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life. The Realme C55 is a better choice for those who value faster charging, a brighter display, and smoother performance for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme C33 2023 good for gaming?
The Realme C33 2023 can handle basic games, but it will struggle with more demanding titles. The Realme C55 is a better choice for gaming due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ How long does it take to charge the Realme C33 2023?
The Realme C33 2023 takes a long time to charge with its 10W charger. Expect around 3-4 hours for a full charge.
