The Realme C3 and vivo Y200+ represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The C3, a veteran of the entry-level space, offers a proven chipset at a competitive price. The Y200+, however, brings a newer, more efficient processor and significantly faster charging to the table. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y200+ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset, built on a 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the Realme C3’s Helio G70. The 44W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing recharge times compared to the C3’s slow 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 05. Released 2020, February 14 | 2025, January 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, January 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75 x 9 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | Weather-sealed ports & loudspeaker | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 14, OriginOS 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frozen Blue, Blazing Red, Volcano Grey shade | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot |
| Models | RMX2027, RMX2020, RMX2021 | - |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 192223 (v8)
GeekBench: 1262 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme C3
- Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
- Proven and reliable MediaTek Helio G70 chipset.
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Slow 10W charging is a significant drawback.
- Older chipset may struggle with demanding tasks.
- Likely larger bezels and less refined display.
vivo Y200+
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset.
- 44W fast charging significantly reduces recharge times.
- Reverse wired charging adds versatility.
- Higher price compared to the Realme C3.
- May not offer substantial camera improvements without specific sensor details.
- Performance gains may not be noticeable for basic users.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price points, both likely feature LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. However, the Y200+’s newer chipset suggests a potentially higher peak brightness and improved color calibration. The Realme C3, being an older model, may exhibit wider bezels. Display quality will likely be a minor differentiator, with both prioritizing functionality over premium features.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Y200+’s newer chipset likely includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), resulting in better image processing and noise reduction. The Realme C3, while capable, will likely struggle in low-light conditions compared to the Y200+. The presence of a more modern ISP in the Y200+ also suggests better support for computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y200+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Realme C3’s MediaTek Helio G70 (12nm). The 4nm process node translates to superior power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning the Y200+ will sustain peak performance for longer periods. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Y200+ utilizes 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offering a performance boost over the C3’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Y200+’s 44W wired charging is a massive advantage. The advertised 50% charge in 36 minutes drastically reduces downtime compared to the C3’s slow 10W charging. Even with a similar battery capacity, the Y200+’s more efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset will likely deliver longer real-world battery life. The Y200+ also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the C3.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme C3 if you prioritize absolute affordability and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. It’s a solid option for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the vivo Y200+ if you value a smoother user experience, faster charging, and a more future-proof chipset, even if it means spending a bit more upfront. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming or frequently use demanding apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y200+ handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process also helps prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions, unlike the Helio G70 which is prone to throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo Y200+ compared to the Realme C3's 10W charging in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Y200+ can reach 50% charge in approximately 36 minutes, while the C3 will take well over two hours to reach the same level. This means you can quickly top up the Y200+ during short breaks, whereas the C3 requires overnight charging for a full battery.
❓ Does the vivo Y200+ support software updates for longer than the Realme C3?
Generally, devices with newer chipsets receive longer software support. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Y200+ is more likely to receive Android version updates and security patches for a longer period compared to the older Helio G70 in the C3.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging feature on the vivo Y200+ useful for everyday scenarios?
Yes, reverse wired charging can be quite handy. It allows you to use the Y200+ as a power bank to charge other devices like wireless earbuds or smartwatches, providing a convenient solution when you're on the go and don't have access to a power outlet.
