Realme C3 vs Samsung Galaxy A11: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Realme C3 and Samsung Galaxy A11 represent two popular choices in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this. The Realme C3 prioritizes processing power with its MediaTek Helio G70, while the Galaxy A11 opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 450, alongside a slightly faster charging solution. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the Realme C3 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Helio G70 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Snapdragon 450 in the Galaxy A11. While the A11 offers 15W charging, the C3’s more powerful processor makes it the better all-around choice for most.

PHONES
Phone Names Realme C3 (3 cameras) Samsung Galaxy A11
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/75 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A115U
Launch
Announced2020, February 19. Released 2020, February 202020, March 13. Released 2020, May 01
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions164.4 x 75 x 9 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.35 in)161.4 x 76.3 x 8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight195 g (6.88 oz)177 g (6.24 oz)
 Weather-sealed ports & loudspeaker-
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3-
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~268 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ)PLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetMediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm)Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm)
GPUMali-G52 2EEMC2Adreno 506
OSAndroid 10, Realme UIAndroid 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI Core 4.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple12 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panorama-
Single5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm8 MP, f/2.0
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX4.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired Reverse wired15W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 4000 mAh
Misc
ColorsFrozen Blue, Blazing RedBlack, White, Blue, Red
Models-SM-A115F/DS, SM-A115F, SM-A115M, SM-A115M/DS, SM-A115U, SM-A115A, SM-A115AZ, SM-A115U1, SM-A115W, SM-A115AP, SM-S115DL
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 160 EUR
SAR EU-0.52 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)

Realme C3 (3 cameras)

  • More powerful Helio G70 processor
  • Potentially better thermal management
  • Likely superior image processing

  • Slower 10W charging
  • Less recognizable brand (potentially)

Samsung Galaxy A11

  • Faster 15W charging
  • Familiar Samsung One UI
  • Established brand reputation

  • Less powerful Snapdragon 450 processor
  • Potentially lower performance under load

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a particularly impressive display. Details regarding panel type and resolution are missing, but given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but rather on basic usability. The absence of high refresh rates or HDR support is expected. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing cost reduction over a premium aesthetic.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature multiple rear cameras, but the specifics are crucial. While both have 3 cameras, the quality will vary. Without detailed sensor information, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Helio G70’s image signal processor (ISP) is likely more advanced than the Snapdragon 450’s, potentially resulting in better image processing and noise reduction. The presence of a dedicated ISP in the G70 allows for faster image capture and more sophisticated algorithms. It's reasonable to assume the Realme C3 will deliver slightly better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme C3’s MediaTek Helio G70 (12nm) features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture is significantly more capable than the Samsung Galaxy A11’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) with its octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The Cortex-A75 cores in the Helio G70 provide a substantial boost in single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 12nm process node of the Helio G70 is also more efficient than the 14nm Snapdragon 450, potentially leading to better thermal management under sustained load. This means the C3 is more likely to maintain peak performance for longer periods during gaming or intensive tasks.

Battery Life

The Realme C3 features 10W wired charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A11 supports 15W wired charging. While the A11 has a faster charging rate, the efficiency of the Helio G70 in the C3 might offset this advantage. The actual 0-100% charging time will depend on battery capacity (which is not provided), but the A11 will likely charge slightly faster. However, the overall battery life will depend on usage patterns and the power efficiency of the respective chipsets. The 12nm process of the Helio G70 could contribute to longer battery life during moderate use.

Buying Guide

Buy the Realme C3 if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding apps and light gaming without significant lag. Its Helio G70 chipset offers a smoother experience for multitasking and media consumption. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A11 if you prioritize a familiar Samsung user interface and slightly faster charging, and your usage primarily revolves around basic tasks like calls, texts, and social media.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Realme C3 struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio G70 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some occasional stuttering, but it's a playable experience, significantly better than the Snapdragon 450 in the Galaxy A11.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the Galaxy A11 a significant advantage over the Realme C3's 10W charging?
The difference in charging speed is noticeable, but not dramatic. Expect the Galaxy A11 to charge approximately 20-30% faster, but the overall time saved isn't substantial. The Realme C3’s more efficient processor might partially offset this difference in real-world usage.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A11 receive more frequent software updates than the Realme C3?
Historically, Samsung has provided more consistent software updates for its devices compared to Realme. However, update frequency can vary, and both phones are in the budget segment, so long-term support cannot be guaranteed.